The Connecticut State Legislature introduced Substitute Bill No. 4 on March 31, 2025, aimed at enhancing the health and safety protocols for line and restoration crews during emergencies and service restorations. The bill outlines several key provisions designed to protect both workers and the public during such critical times.

One of the primary objectives of the bill is to ensure that line and restoration crews are equipped with appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) and that comprehensive training and skills plans are developed. These plans must be collaboratively created by utility companies and any relevant collective bargaining units, ensuring that workers' voices are included in safety measures. The bill mandates that these plans address service outages affecting varying percentages of customers, specifically those exceeding ten, thirty, fifty, and seventy percent.

Additionally, the bill requires the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) to submit biannual reports to the General Assembly summarizing these safety plans. Furthermore, PURA is tasked with conducting public hearings every two years to review and potentially revise these plans in consultation with various state departments, including Emergency Services and Public Health.

The introduction of this bill has sparked notable discussions among legislators and stakeholders. Proponents argue that it is a necessary step to safeguard workers and the community during emergencies, especially in light of increasing weather-related incidents. Critics, however, express concerns about the potential costs associated with implementing these safety measures and the confidentiality of the plans, which may limit public transparency.

The implications of Substitute Bill No. 4 are significant, as it seeks to establish a more robust framework for emergency preparedness in Connecticut. Experts suggest that if enacted, the bill could lead to improved safety outcomes for workers and the public alike, potentially reducing the risks associated with service outages during emergencies. As the legislative process unfolds, the bill's future will depend on ongoing debates and the willingness of lawmakers to balance safety with economic considerations.