Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Legislators update Chapter 342 to include epinephrine for anaphylaxis treatment

March 31, 2025 | Introduced, House, 2025 Bills, Massachusetts Legislation Bills, Massachusetts


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Legislators update Chapter 342 to include epinephrine for anaphylaxis treatment
House Bill 1359, introduced in Massachusetts on March 31, 2025, aims to enhance healthcare coverage for individuals experiencing anaphylaxis by mandating insurance provisions for epinephrine autoinjectors. The bill seeks to address the critical need for accessible emergency treatment for severe allergic reactions, which can be life-threatening.

Key provisions of the bill include amendments to existing healthcare regulations, specifically targeting the coverage of epinephrine delivered via autoinjectors. Notably, the bill stipulates that coverage for one brand name or one generic brand of epinephrine autoinjector will not be subject to any deductible or co-insurance. Additionally, co-payments for a two-pack of these autoinjectors will be capped at $60, making it more affordable for patients who rely on this medication.

The bill also expands the definition of covered conditions to include anaphylaxis, alongside other acute conditions, ensuring that individuals diagnosed with this severe allergic reaction receive necessary treatment without financial barriers. This legislative move reflects a growing recognition of the importance of timely access to life-saving medications.

Debate surrounding House Bill 1359 has highlighted the ongoing challenges in healthcare affordability and accessibility. Supporters argue that the bill is a crucial step toward protecting public health, particularly for those with severe allergies. However, some opposition has emerged from insurance providers concerned about the potential financial implications of mandated coverage.

The implications of this bill extend beyond individual health; it may also influence broader discussions on healthcare policy in Massachusetts. Experts suggest that if passed, House Bill 1359 could set a precedent for future legislation aimed at improving access to essential medications, potentially impacting insurance practices statewide.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its outcomes will be closely monitored by healthcare advocates and policymakers alike, with the potential to significantly affect the lives of many residents in Massachusetts who face the threat of anaphylaxis.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Massachusetts articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI