North Dakota Assembly debates Senate bill 2384 affecting greyhound and horse racing industries

In a spirited session of the North Dakota State Legislature on March 31, 2025, lawmakers engaged in a heated debate over the future of horse racing and the controversial Senate Bill 2384, which seeks to eliminate greyhound racing in the state. The discussions highlighted the intricate relationship between animal racing, local economies, and legislative influence from external groups.

As the clock ticked past noon, representatives gathered to discuss the implications of the proposed bill, which some argue could jeopardize the horse racing industry in North Dakota. Proponents of the bill emphasized the need to phase out greyhound racing, citing concerns from animal rights organizations. However, opponents warned that removing greyhound wagering could lead to a significant decline in horse racing, which has been a staple of North Dakota's agricultural landscape.

Representative Novak passionately defended the horse racing industry, stating that it supports thousands of jobs and contributes millions in tax revenue. He noted that last year, North Dakota hosted two live race meets, generating approximately 600 license applications and a 90% approval rate. "Racing is not just a sport; it’s a business that stretches from jockeys to fans, veterinarians, ranchers, and communities," he asserted, emphasizing the economic impact of the industry.

The debate intensified as lawmakers discussed the potential fallout from the bill. Representative Hager pointed out that if the bill passed, it could lead to the departure of several Advanced Deposit Wagering (ADW) companies, which account for a significant portion of the state's racing revenue. "If we lose these ADWs, we lose tens of millions of dollars in tax revenue," he warned, illustrating the domino effect that could ensue.

Opponents of the bill also raised concerns about the influence of out-of-state animal rights groups, suggesting that their agenda could undermine local industries. Representative Vedder argued that the bill was a "real dog and pony show," designed to benefit external interests rather than support North Dakota's farmers and ranchers.

As the session progressed, representatives exchanged anecdotes and statistics, painting a vivid picture of the stakes involved. The North Dakota Horse Park, which has been operational for over 20 years, was highlighted as a critical player in the local economy, partnering with North Dakota State University to maintain its facilities. The park has contributed significantly to both the racing and breeding sectors, generating substantial tax revenue for the state.

In a final push, lawmakers were urged to consider the long-term implications of their vote. With the effective date of the bill set for August 1, 2027, there remains time for further assessment of the racing industry’s future in North Dakota. As the session drew to a close, the assembly faced a pivotal decision: support a bill that could reshape the landscape of animal racing or stand by an industry that has deep roots in the state’s culture and economy. The outcome of this debate will undoubtedly resonate beyond the legislative floor, impacting the livelihoods of many North Dakotans.