Senate Bill 210 faced fierce opposition during a recent meeting of the Oregon Senate Committee on Rules, with multiple speakers highlighting concerns over its potential to eliminate vote-by-mail options. Gloria Chawasandoval, representing Unite Oregon, emphasized that the bill would disproportionately affect marginalized communities, making it harder for individuals with multiple jobs or caregiving responsibilities to participate in elections. "Time is not a luxury everyone has," she stated, arguing that the bill undermines the accessibility of Oregon's electoral system.

Renee Asher, a resident of rural Coos County, echoed these sentiments, noting that many individuals were unable to testify due to a lack of communication from the committee. She pointed out that rural voters often face significant barriers to accessing polling places, making mail-in voting essential for their participation. "Repealing mail-in voting would be a big mistake," she warned.

Rebecca Gladstone from the League of Women Voters of Oregon also voiced strong opposition, calling the elimination of vote-by-mail "irresponsibly inefficient" and detrimental to voter engagement. She urged committee members to consider the logistical challenges many voters face, including mobility issues and family obligations.

In contrast, Chad Cornett advocated for the bill, arguing that voting should be an in-person endeavor conducted on election day. He raised concerns about the integrity of past elections, questioning the validity of mail-in voting.

The committee's chair, along with other members, acknowledged the overwhelming public interest in the bill, with a significant majority of testimony opposing it. As discussions continue, the future of Senate Bill 210 remains uncertain, with advocates for accessible voting urging lawmakers to prioritize inclusivity in Oregon's electoral process.