[{"_1":2,"_100":-5,"_101":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6097687,"mediaKeyId","2827644-a37db96f77745e72e6bb33631bee50e0","parentId",2827644,"title","Committee declines to finalize 2025–26 school‑choice spots; calls for public hearing and more financial/service data","audioSeconds",1253,"startMs",4796000,"endMs",6049000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2827644-a37db96f77745e72e6bb33631bee50e0&start=4796&end=6049","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2827644-a37db96f77745e72e6bb33631bee50e0/thumbnail_4796000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6097687/Massachusetts/Committee-declines-to-finalize-202526-schoolchoice-spots-calls-for-public-hearing-and-more-financialservice-data","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6097687-745685912e83fd02ea9326f8ed358ba1/orig.mp4?Expires=1771143838&Signature=nT~MWrWTJODsNyi-aJJnYzjpp0zSWbz35Bk5GaIFMuq8ru9fbPt4122QtqUZLtbS0I8C17eXjFxOMHR12DOOED9jfgFV0WSC4zh1K0lEe3~DDqEjFRUvuqHipe6QUWtFa76mEVODEo-BMy88Q-HgcDvRQ9I0cGcMYwAOjsJW8in~8fHwJmzmnt2qqcNLBt8PKdv0~hqHWjEQXhPXyv8QMq8VxtvGwnDYM-HmpEFcN-QVEdJADJ~MsxEEW07v8GNzwPNt-Gfq9PJbC30XZpJv0mi5fVcbq9EmYjkekcBTA4nkGy340AHUYAFy51DpmO3Ioue5-dPZzp-2dpYk2scr7Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Norton Public Schools, MA","date","2025-04-01T01:03:38.197Z","article","Christine, a district administrator, told the committee the district currently accepts 231 school‑choice students (down from 247 the previous year) and proposed targeted increases in particular grades based on projected class sizes. Recommendations included four additional kindergarten slots in Grade 2 at LGN, two in Grade 3 at JCS, up to 10 in Grade 7, and caps of five in Grade 8 and in Grades 9–10; administrators emphasized projections were designed to preserve average class sizes and maintain flexibility for resident moves.

Committee members asked how siblings and staff exceptions would be handled (administration said siblings are permitted by regulation; staff‑child exceptions are typically contract perks and would not be covered by school‑choice tuition if the district stopped accepting school‑choice students). Members also asked whether Medicaid or other special‑education reimbursements follow school‑choice students; administrators said the district submits eligible services to Medicaid and will research how reimbursements are allocated between resident and nonresident districts.

After discussion, a committee member moved to approve the school‑choice numbers as presented; the motion was seconded. The meeting audio shows the motion received affirmative responses but then the chair recorded the motion as “denied” and several members asked for clarification. The subsequent discussion concluded more information was needed. The transcript records no final approval of the recommended school‑choice increases.

Committee members asked administration to produce: (1) a detailed breakdown of current school‑choice students by grade and services received, (2) revenue and cost estimates tied to school‑choice enrollment (including tuition/reimbursements and additional special‑education costs), (3) counts of staff children and siblings currently enrolled, and (4) legal/contract implications if the district elects to stop accepting new school‑choice students. The committee discussed but did not adopt a freeze; instead members instructed administration to prepare the requested data and to schedule any required public hearing if the committee decides to change its school‑choice status before the May 1 state deadline.

No new school‑choice policy was adopted at the March 26 meeting; administrators said they will return with additional information and noted that any change in school‑choice status requires a public‑hearing process under state rules.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Norton School Committee Meeting","oneSentenceSummary","Administrators recommended limited increases in school‑choice seats based on projected class sizes, but after discussion the School Committee did not adopt the recommendations and asked for more data and a public hearing if the district considers changing school‑choice status.","taxTitle","Norton Public Schools, School Boards, Massachusetts","taxId",69157,"location","Massachusetts","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6097692,"School committee tables 2025–26 calendar after debate over half‑day professional development and bus/PD tradeoffs",1981,2510000,4491000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2827644-a37db96f77745e72e6bb33631bee50e0&start=2510&end=4491","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2827644-a37db96f77745e72e6bb33631bee50e0/thumbnail_2510000.jpg","/articles/6097692/Massachusetts/School-committee-tables-202526-calendar-after-debate-over-halfday-professional-development-and-busPD-tradeoffs","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6097692-5591036f575707268d1ba0eca2358567/orig.mp4?Expires=1771143838&Signature=MTl92f-SEVBL6W4qAKrSOO3FXal7FL9YCeRjiZ-LAhwG3yhxF2ML9yP4qipoCmIXX66CvF0c3JCvShTgek2kHn~46hGnznTvzYmWSf5WuIFBw1J-IzimSgTtbNIXNp0WbK0u2ciH~T-31plBiznMtuLNJ2FZg1F~StnDxY7yGJDAUqF~NJ-0DP6G1QgUSR4BWB363HSjgZ8ybmK7kP04M3pIhNc1--40pYbYyZJyEnBm~nxZZctt3RbtFvqfWKtnPEMsK2ZNyP2PCAkzOjXcdYC-xtXmfiH2tQ1pCzSUnZ0JXLdHHzKfCY9nmS2y03qcWAuMH1LbdK2rsCKB59WXJQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Dr. O’Brien, a district administrator, presented the proposed 2025–26 school calendar on March 26 and said the district planned to move monthly early‑release days from Fridays to Wednesdays and keep the structure of 10 district‑wide early release days for staff professional development.

Discussion among School Committee members and administrators focused on whether the district should convert half‑day PD sessions into fewer full PD days, how those options interact with contracted teacher workdays, and whether election days or other “wild‑card” closures could be repurposed as full PD days without adding contract days. Administrators said current staffing contracts and state required hours (990 for middle/high school, 900 for elementary) constrain calendar changes without negotiation.

Administrators explained November, December and the last day of school are currently half days; converting additional half days into full PD days would affect negotiations with staff and the district’s total instructional hours but could reduce fragmentation of PD. Committee members suggested alternatives such as swapping dates (move a February half‑day into March, or shift April/May half‑days) and asked staff to investigate whether a full day could be added without raising the number of contracted workdays.

After extended discussion about PD timing, childcare impacts for families, AP testing and contract negotiations, a motion to table the calendar and direct administration to develop additional options passed. The motion instructed administration to review the calendar with an eye toward fewer half‑days in exchange for full PD days where possible, and to return options at a future meeting.

Motion to table: district administration to review the 2025–26 calendar and return alternative scenarios. Motion moved and seconded and approved by the committee; no calendar changes were adopted at the March 26 meeting.","The committee voted to table approval of the 2025–26 school calendar and asked administration to seek additional options after members debated moving monthly early‑release professional development days, swapping half days for full PD days, and negotiating contract/coverage implications.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6097697,"Norton panel reopens school start-time review, plans more community outreach and options analysis",1987,472000,2459000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2827644-a37db96f77745e72e6bb33631bee50e0&start=472&end=2459","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2827644-a37db96f77745e72e6bb33631bee50e0/thumbnail_472000.jpg","/articles/6097697/Massachusetts/Norton-panel-reopens-school-start-time-review-plans-more-community-outreach-and-options-analysis","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6097697-5c1749aae94173405a627861037ec958/orig.mp4?Expires=1771143838&Signature=aHqbPoEsMsJ9eTgKo5YOS1cL0mQuYMzLmjn1rirlJu1Qa-w2nR1DuY0oIOMrExD0Hl1ydRaQtNgCKACnArDCrC1m5T8etA-YPTjDEe6UHITluhy4nJds~3tZVu7xBaLf7JEXY1SbPX0abhgyDacfQRdTG0RBjtkqHoaTdWs1h30cCpa60fyGGmGfBMGYw-wwlbZeTfxrHb4GIc1K3Se7X7-yntX2rYZxJBQM~vhA09IcfHJktMFkMKSyQsodbUucx9rdFnB~v8AljmcSL982~642~JjqPVT5rSdOn8EnQWfvD01tW4gEP6dOZqKwLT-MJoGrNuf8P8n71SgoihCB0Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Dr. Rabia, a district administrator, told the Norton School Committee on March 26 that the district’s School Start Time Committee recommends “Option 2,” which would align high school and middle school bell times, create a combined elementary bus route and bring most elementary schools to a consistent start time for the first time in more than two decades.

The committee said potential benefits include more consistent K–12 schedules, shared professional development, easier third-grade transition planning and opportunities for middle-school students to take advanced high‑school courses. Dr. Rabia said the proposal would also allow older students to be released earlier than younger siblings, which some families prefer.

The recommendation carries significant challenges, she said. Cost estimates provided to the committee show adding buses to create two tiers would cost roughly $60,000 per additional bus; the plan could require adding at least one elementary-run bus and at least one high‑school/middle‑school bus. Committee members also raised concerns about student safety on longer combined routes, the effect of later elementary dismissal times in winter months, and whether new housing developments under construction could require near-term redistricting.

Board members urged more study and community engagement before any vote. Committee member Nick asked for clarified budget impacts of a two‑year rollout that would split bus purchases across years; Dr. Rabia said the staged approach spreads the cost but warned it risks repeating a decades‑old two‑year promise that never fully resolved. Several members suggested the district explore higher‑capacity “flat‑nose” buses the provider may have, which can legally carry more pupils and might reduce the number of added vehicles.

Committee members also debated whether to pursue redistricting concurrently with start‑time changes. Some members said aligning elementary schedules would simplify later redistricting; others argued redistricting should be planned first to avoid repeated schedule changes for families. Dr. Rabia said she will visit school parent boards, hold a community forum on April 28, arrange staff forums and gather additional data, and report back to the committee at the April 16 meeting.

No formal vote was taken on a start‑time change at the March 26 meeting. The committee instructed administration to continue outreach, collect more financial and enrollment data, and explore consultant options or peer-district practices to inform any possible implementation timeline.

“I want to get this right,” Dr. Rabia said; several committee members echoed that they want a thorough, community‑centered process before approving any schedule change.

The district emphasized the committee’s work is preliminary: any official start‑time change would require further public engagement and likely additional analysis of redistricting and transportation costs.","Superintendent Dr. Rabia and the start-time committee presented Option 2, which would align many Norton schools’ bell times and consolidate bus tiers. Board members asked for more analysis on redistricting, costs and safety; administration will hold forums and return with more information.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Committee declines to finalize 2025–26 school‑choice spots; calls for public hearing and more financial/service data

School committee tables 2025–26 calendar after debate over half‑day professional development and bus/PD tradeoffs

Norton panel reopens school start-time review, plans more community outreach and options analysis