Pacific residents oppose Large Investments LLC's proposed 18-home development on Katie Lane

The City of Pacific Board of Aldermen meeting on January 21, 2025, was marked by a heated public discussion regarding a proposed voluntary annexation by Large Investments LLC for a property at 584 Katie Lane. The proposal, which involves the development of 18 homes on approximately 6.3 acres, has sparked significant concern among local residents about the potential impact on the community's character and infrastructure.

During the public hearing, several residents voiced their opposition to the density of the proposed development. Kevin Doyle, a nearby resident, expressed his support for responsible development but argued that the number of homes planned is excessive for the area. "Eighteen or nineteen homes on this amount of land is entirely too much," he stated, urging the board to consider the implications of such a dense housing project.

Robin Pritchett, another resident, echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the need to maintain the rural atmosphere of the neighborhood. She highlighted that the proposed rezoning to R-1B would lead to smaller lots that do not align with the existing properties, which are characterized by larger lot sizes. "This would definitely take away from the country feel of the area," she warned, advocating for a minimum lot size that would better match the surrounding homes.

Residents also raised concerns about increased traffic and the potential loss of natural barriers that currently mitigate noise from nearby highways and trains. Pritchett urged the board to limit the number of homes to no more than 8 to 10, arguing that such a decision would benefit the community rather than just the developer.

As the meeting progressed, the board acknowledged the residents' concerns and indicated that they would take the feedback into consideration before making any decisions regarding the annexation and development proposal. The outcome of this discussion could significantly shape the future of the area, balancing the need for development with the preservation of community character.