Residents oppose proposed gas station in McKinney citing traffic and safety concerns

The McKinney City Council held a regular meeting on March 31, 2025, where significant concerns were raised regarding a proposed gas station at the intersection of Inwood Drive and Highway 380. Residents from the surrounding neighborhoods, including Inwood and Woodley, voiced strong opposition to the project, citing issues related to traffic congestion, safety, and community well-being.

Jimmy Rogers, a resident of 1012 Inwood Drive, led the charge against the gas station, presenting a petition with 76 signatures from local residents. He highlighted the existing traffic problems in the area, noting that the addition of another gas station would exacerbate congestion and create safety hazards for pedestrians, particularly children. Rogers also pointed out that the planning and zoning board had to grant multiple variances for the project, indicating potential concerns about its fit within the community.

Other residents echoed Rogers' sentiments, emphasizing the dangers posed by increased traffic and the potential for loitering and crime associated with gas stations. David Picasso, a resident of 809 Inwood Drive, expressed fears for neighborhood safety, particularly for children playing outside. He described the current traffic conditions as chaotic, with cars speeding through residential streets as drivers seek shortcuts to avoid congestion on Highway 380.

Gina Yodas, living on West Way, shared her worries about the safety of children in the area, noting that speeding cars pose a significant risk. She also mentioned the growing homeless population, which has become more visible in the neighborhood, further complicating safety concerns.

Terry Lopez, another resident, recounted a troubling incident involving a homeless individual entering a neighbor's backyard, highlighting the community's struggles with homelessness and crime. Lopez, along with other speakers, urged the council to consider the negative impacts of the proposed gas station on their close-knit community.

The council members appeared receptive to the residents' concerns, with discussions suggesting a potential tabling of the proposal to allow for further community engagement. The meeting concluded with a motion to close the public hearing, indicating that the council would deliberate on the matter further.

Overall, the meeting underscored the residents' commitment to preserving the character and safety of their neighborhood, as they rallied against the proposed gas station and its anticipated consequences. The council's next steps will be crucial in determining the future of this contentious project.