On April 2, 2025, a public hearing was held by the State of Maine to discuss the proposed agriculture fair dates for 2026 to 2029, with significant focus on the scheduling conflicts between the Fryeburg Fair and the Cumberland Fair. The meeting highlighted the challenges faced by fair organizers as they navigate licensing issues and competition for attendees.
A key point of contention arose from Fryeburg Fair's decision to operate on the Saturday before its official license dates, despite not having the necessary license to reimburse premiums through the stipend fund. This decision has sparked controversy, particularly with representatives from the Cumberland Fair, who expressed concerns about the potential negative impact on their attendance and operations. The Cumberland Fair traditionally holds its largest events on the last day of its fair, which coincides with Fryeburg's opening day.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Fryeburg Fair organizers defended their choice, emphasizing the need to support Midway operators—those who provide rides and food at fairs—who have been dwindling in number. They argued that leaving weekends unused could jeopardize the financial viability of fairs, as these days are crucial for generating revenue. The Fryeburg Fair plans to host a full schedule of events, including sheepdog trials and tractor pulls, while assuring livestock exhibitors and vendors that they will be accommodated after the Cumberland Fair concludes.
Conversely, representatives from the Cumberland Fair voiced strong opposition to Fryeburg's scheduling, arguing that it undermines the collaborative spirit promoted by the Maine Association of Fairs (MAF). They called for a process to protect established fair dates, expressing concern that overlapping schedules could threaten the survival of smaller fairs.
The meeting concluded without a resolution, leaving the future of fair scheduling in Maine uncertain. As the state continues to evaluate the implications of these scheduling conflicts, the discussions underscore the delicate balance between competition and cooperation among agricultural fairs in the region. The next steps will likely involve further dialogue among fair organizers and state officials to address these concerns and establish a fair scheduling process that supports all parties involved.