[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6092581,"mediaKeyId","2852682-74a6c76311acd52ccaf46fcc2e194684","parentId",2852682,"title","Corcoran council approves Brockton Lane Business Park preliminary plat and site plan","audioSeconds",570,"startMs",4480000,"endMs",5050000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2852682-74a6c76311acd52ccaf46fcc2e194684&start=4480&end=5050","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2852682-74a6c76311acd52ccaf46fcc2e194684/thumbnail_4480000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6092581/Corcoran-City/Hennepin-County/Minnesota/Corcoran-council-approves-Brockton-Lane-Business-Park-preliminary-plat-and-site-plan","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6092581-b3dae2c450231a1fc6f57aa9b789b101/orig.mp4?Expires=1775940884&Signature=U2rZkYQbvUpwKDFj-NHqypW10-JOrqBO98V-P2i-~PboyXfY17kM8VFzDvNW8awH72SaIcaCQjIbwMNcpzJ23HWMMdQPUNPyIRSzhF6WDPN~O4F7IVdIl9idYammHCPYydeTzixgloQNG7LvRmVCwtmZantnj4qaU4GsjjKSsWNHuokVBIw948D48oHaNe7SgBrSqvhT26jR-rQMUcwnj0iD4UbEVcP-cnp3gRQ-U3AEx5LpdQROr-scEzrmnZjsqlF8tmXlV-rZUeNv-s~IiGG0WeF0ffLGXxnURBteap3MVrydfdeD40AkeNmQDQvxweSidYw85u8~lV2uqlslhw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City Council of Corcoran, MN","date","2025-03-31T20:15:09Z","article","The Corcoran City Council voted to approve a preliminary plat and a site plan for the Brockton Lane Business Park on March 25, advancing plans for two industrial warehouse buildings on an 80‑acre site in the city’s northeast industrial district.

City planning staff described the project as two speculative office‑warehouse buildings totaling about a half‑million square feet, to be served by two new public streets and sequencing planned for two phases: the building on County Road 101 first, followed by the second building the following year. The applicant proposed landscaping, berms to screen truck docks and six electric‑vehicle charging stations to meet the city’s Northeast District resiliency guidelines.

Planning staff and the developer told council the site is in the MUSA (municipal‑utility service area) and that an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) and a notice of decision had been completed. Staff noted wetlands and a large wetland complex that constrain buildable area, and said the plans reduce impervious cover well below the 60 percent Northeast District target (staff estimated about 32 percent impervious). The plan includes a proposed well site to be deeded to the city.

Council members discussed building height (staff clarified interior clear height around 32 feet and a maximum building height under the code of 45 feet), materials and the need to break up long wall planes with changes in color, elevation or material every 80 feet as required in the district design standards. Staff recommended and council adopted conditions to finalize screening, the cross‑access agreement for shared truck docks, landscaping materials (e.g., wood‑chip rather than rock mulch), and engineering review for a retaining wall up to 15 feet high on the northern collector street.

Developer representatives said they expect to begin construction this summer and emphasized conduit to make future expansion of EV charging easier; they also expressed willingness to work with the city on the look of the retaining wall and on a possible “Welcome to Corcoran” monument feature.

Council subsequently adopted two resolutions (Resolution 2025‑27, approving the preliminary plat; Resolution 2025‑28, approving the site plan) after a motion and unanimous voice vote.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","City of Corcoran City Council Meeting March 27, 2025 (Part 1)","oneSentenceSummary","The Corcoran City Council voted to approve a preliminary plat and a site plan for the Brockton Lane Business Park on March 25, advancing plans for two industrial warehouse buildings on an 80‑acre site in the city’s northeast industrial district.","taxTitle","Corcoran City, Hennepin County, Minnesota","taxId",71421,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6092576,"Council considers Lothar comprehensive‑plan amendment after neighbors urge denial",550,5069000,5619000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2852682-74a6c76311acd52ccaf46fcc2e194684&start=5069&end=5619","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2852682-74a6c76311acd52ccaf46fcc2e194684/thumbnail_5069000.jpg","/articles/6092576/Corcoran-City/Hennepin-County/Minnesota/Council-considers-Lothar-comprehensiveplan-amendment-after-neighbors-urge-denial","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6092576-3fe1e265fe1624cd803c0058b41a43e4/orig.mp4?Expires=1775940884&Signature=HGd~mdfJ4yQszMKphVQHqNYhRB2aKe3XNOOr9XU54B3eIDGnLUKhtQcu5j8Qb4GGGQc4kkpY873nryX5a9DsFD3Nq9JfjpLhSx6QhKtr6jOtOz3Px0P8ehkyZkwYL7G1Cm5a3sUJn-hIqMS4dXeWhyX4PwKTvZh4MU-KqeFyeabbK9iFcUyo92LQOMeMQ2SPWynAi5o6~C5IVT4r2haqnbhJtTkiL6aMRtNSJUSHEPY2SFip05Ia9APQrb-22u3OfZ~aBthGd8Dxo1xuQAwoQg8tWif24JWgvM01HT~UPQre0OMhgS-~UgRD2JYFjJvO8lo6AbNnED2Yoz0NnU1rZA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Property owners Brian and Jackie Lothar asked the Corcoran City Council to amend the comprehensive plan guidance for their 9.87‑acre parcel at 10110 County Road 116 from “existing residential” to “conservation residential,” a change the applicants say would permit subdivision at a lower density once municipal sewer and water are available.

Planning staff recommended approval of Resolution 2025‑31, stating the change would have a minimal effect on the city’s overall density calculations in the MUSA and would enable subdivision at a low density (the conservation‑residential category in the city’s plan anticipates 2–3 units per acre). Planning staff also noted that the property was shown with a future access on a 2020 “ghost plat” related to the city’s water treatment plant acquisition and that sewer and water stubs are in place near the site.

At the Planning Commission earlier in March the commission voted 3–1 to recommend denial and suggested a different approach: creating a new lower‑density land‑use category that would be city‑driven rather than an application‑driven change. Planning staff and consultants warned that establishing a 1–2 units‑per‑acre category would be difficult to implement in the MUSA and could create long‑term maintenance and infrastructure viability issues.

At the council meeting the applicants said the property was envisioned for future access when the city purchased the adjacent well and water treatment site and that they seek a more protective, lower‑density option now rather than risk higher densities required by future regional planning. Neighbors from Hunters Ridge asked the council to deny the amendment, saying the change would primarily benefit the applicant, would increase local density in an area already subject to nearby development, and that a road connection for safety could be provided without enabling a subdivision. One neighbor urged the council not to change rules “so they can maximize their profit.”

Council member discussion acknowledged the competing policy considerations: the city’s obligation to meet Met Council density targets, the practical difficulty of creating new very‑low‑density categories inside the MUSA, and neighbors’ desire to preserve local character. A motion to approve Resolution 2025‑31 was made, but the council paused for public comment; the transcript ends after several residents spoke and before a final council vote was recorded in the transcript.

Because the record shows public comment and a Planning Commission split recommendation, the application remained before the council for deliberation; the council had not recorded a final vote on the amendment in the provided transcript.","Brian and Jackie Lothar asked the Corcoran City Council to change their property’s comprehensive‑plan guidance so the parcel could be subdivided at a low density; planning staff recommended approval while the Planning Commission recommended denial and neighbors urged the council to reject the change.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6092587,"Residents of Maple Hill Estates ask Corcoran to intervene after new management’s towing, lease changes",1542,226000,1768000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2852682-74a6c76311acd52ccaf46fcc2e194684&start=226&end=1768","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2852682-74a6c76311acd52ccaf46fcc2e194684/thumbnail_226000.jpg","/articles/6092587/Corcoran-City/Hennepin-County/Minnesota/Residents-of-Maple-Hill-Estates-ask-Corcoran-to-intervene-after-new-managements-towing-lease-changes","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6092587-2583a5575dad45ab2dc2685fcd72b00a/orig.mp4?Expires=1775940884&Signature=kusHiH4zXZ45i9Gm9seqyoTzPPvQUJYXULEinWsXElD0AAOaKEtm5H3b4VyAja9PsCo9IeSctZioehYJgAwXSeJ7VlpIpoMY~3HbDs1rBzj7vdD1AJWN8yOvG0DF4qI4zI7-mpNJkRhMWkGFgqUHUxkTRQ0SUyMD-SqkN38xHRnwCABOi3MN4xoe9rvSNHTTKk5raDIMGRLng5iT82OI8s1z9vlk0hWzxhA2wxVpmwLDDSU~f2yIkRFQKgNbB4l6ea9hkDcYQUYvssOHzbvFk1zqUI0McOZQq7nnRvjkzyV~cDLUqV8CpJJMD4ZLNgwSHKHnu1c16HBHVWOrIsDzwQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Miss Christina Jensen told the Corcoran City Council on March 25 that residents of Maple Hill Estates are facing rapid changes under a new out‑of‑state owner and property manager, including vehicle tows, trespass notices and large rent increases.

The residents who spoke at the council’s open forum said the management company gave notice by mail only, did not answer questions, and in multiple instances ordered towing of vehicles that residents say were legally tagged. “Within 24 hours of a man dying, his property was confiscated by a towing company that was ordered by our new management company,” Christina Jensen said. She said she was told she would be trespassed for confronting a tow and that police later served a no‑trespass on her.

The issue matters to many people in Corcoran: speakers described tenants and homeowners who rely on neighbors for nursing care, medication administration and daily support. Sandra Johnson, who said she has emphysema and depends on a neighbor for help, told the council the trespass order is preventing vital caregiving visits. Diane Lindgren and Francine Woodford added that residents report being pressured to pay cash to have vehicles released and that storage areas for trailers and boats were closed without the notice residents expected.

Residents asked the council to press the management company to meet residents and negotiate a “happy medium,” and urged the city to clarify residents’ legal protections for mobile‑home communities. Francine Woodford told the council she has filed a complaint with the state attorney general and cited state statutes (not specified in her remarks) she believes the manager has violated.

Council members responded by asking staff to gather information. One council member asked staff to prepare a memo or brief presentation explaining what avenues the city has to influence the situation and “whether in staff’s assessment, any laws are being violated.” City staff said they would research available county and state resources, noted the city’s limited direct authority over private mobile‑home communities, and offered to connect residents with county health and human services and housing litigation resources.

Mayor and staff pledged to compile resources and contact points; staff also said they have the email address of at least one resident and would use it to coordinate a follow‑up. At the meeting, councilors suggested introducing residents to county social‑service and legal‑aid contacts and exploring whether a shared social worker might provide short‑term help, while noting that some housing and human services programs are administered at the county level.

The council did not take a formal vote on a policy change during the meeting but instructed staff to gather information and return with options.

Residents’ requests for mediation and for the city to check whether state statutes have been violated remain open; several residents said they plan to pursue administrative complaints and legal remedies independently.","Multiple residents of Maple Hill Estates told the Corcoran City Council that a newly hired management company has been towing vehicles, issuing trespass notices and imposing steep rent increases without clear notice, and they asked the city to mediate and check whether state law has been violated.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Corcoran council approves Brockton Lane Business Park preliminary plat and site plan

Council considers Lothar comprehensive‑plan amendment after neighbors urge denial

Residents of Maple Hill Estates ask Corcoran to intervene after new management’s towing, lease changes