On April 3, 2025, the Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists convened to discuss critical updates regarding examination and licensing processes, as well as the concerning elimination of the geology program at Sonoma State University. The meeting highlighted significant developments in the administration of professional exams and the implications of educational program cuts on future licensing in California.
The meeting began with an update from Larry Kerest, the exam manager, who reported on the ongoing spring 2025 examination administration. The state geology exam was successfully conducted on March 4, followed by the national ASBOG exams. Upcoming exams include the state land surveyor exam on April 9 and the NCES national exam on April 15. Kerest emphasized that results from these exams would be shared with the board once available.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free A key topic of discussion was the introduction of new test specifications for the certified hydrogeologist exam, set to take effect in October 2025. The board unanimously approved these specifications, indicating a commitment to maintaining high standards in professional licensure.
However, the meeting took a more serious turn when the board addressed the elimination of the geology program at Sonoma State University. This decision raised alarms about the potential decrease in qualified geology licensees in California. Board members expressed concerns that the reduction of such programs could lead to a shortage of professionals in the field, ultimately impacting public safety and environmental management.
Josh, a board member, shared insights from a recent outreach event at Sonoma State, where he met with faculty and students. He noted that the elimination of the geology program could hinder students' ability to meet the rigorous educational requirements for licensure, particularly the essential field geology class. The board discussed the broader implications of this trend, as similar cuts were reported across various universities nationwide, potentially leading to a decline in the number of qualified geologists.
The board also explored potential legislative solutions to address the barriers to licensure created by these educational cuts. Suggestions included allowing professional experience to substitute for certain educational requirements, thereby providing a pathway for individuals who may lack specific coursework but possess relevant field experience.
In conclusion, the meeting underscored the board's proactive stance on maintaining high standards for professional licensure while addressing the challenges posed by educational program cuts. The board plans to continue advocating for the importance of geology programs and exploring legislative changes to ensure a steady pipeline of qualified professionals in California. As the landscape of higher education evolves, the board remains committed to protecting public interests and ensuring the availability of licensed geologists in the state.