Smithfield zoning board considers unique ADU request behind mixed-use structure

During the recent Smithfield Zoning Board meeting on April 2, 2025, a significant discussion emerged regarding the potential construction of an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) on a mixed-use property. The proposal, which aims to provide a living space for a family member, has sparked concerns among board members and community residents about the implications of allowing such a development.

One of the primary issues raised was the desire of the property owners to create a separate living space for their son, which they believe would foster independence while keeping the family close. However, board members expressed apprehension about the potential for unrelated tenants living in close proximity, which could lead to logistical challenges and alter the neighborhood's character.

The discussion highlighted the financial implications of the project, with estimates suggesting that the construction of the ADU could cost around $300,000. Concerns were voiced about the long-term viability of the investment, particularly in the event of unforeseen circumstances such as divorce or foreclosure. Board members noted that these scenarios could complicate ownership and financing, raising questions about the sustainability of such arrangements.

Despite these concerns, some members of the board acknowledged the unique nature of the property and the family's intentions. They argued that the proposal aligns with the spirit of the zoning ordinance, which aims to support family-oriented living arrangements. The discussion also touched on the broader context of changing state laws that may influence zoning regulations in the future, suggesting that this proposal could set a precedent for similar requests.

As the meeting concluded, the board recognized the need for further deliberation on the lot configuration and the specifics of the proposal. The outcome of this discussion will have lasting implications for the community, as it navigates the balance between accommodating family needs and maintaining the integrity of residential areas. The board is expected to revisit the proposal in future meetings, continuing to weigh the interests of the property owners against the concerns of the community.