Merrimack residents express concerns over proposed 69-unit housing development

During a recent Merrimack Town Council meeting on March 26, 2025, significant discussions emerged regarding zoning regulations and the potential impact of new housing developments on local traffic and community dynamics. The meeting highlighted concerns from council members and residents about the implications of increasing the number of housing units in the area, particularly in relation to traffic congestion and community character.

One of the primary topics of discussion centered on the proposed increase in housing units from 23 to 69. Council members expressed apprehension about the potential for increased traffic on Tinker Road, a route already experiencing heavy use. The concern was that the addition of up to 138 cars could exacerbate existing traffic issues, making it more difficult for residents to navigate their neighborhoods. This concern was underscored by previous experiences where traffic studies did not accurately predict the current congestion levels, leading to skepticism about the reliability of such assessments.

Another critical point raised was the potential for investment properties to be rented out, which could further complicate the community's demographic makeup. Questions were posed about what measures could be implemented to prevent investors from purchasing multiple units and renting them out, thereby altering the intended use of the properties. The discussion suggested that while there are mechanisms to address these concerns, such as age restrictions and declarations within homeowners' associations, the effectiveness of these measures remains to be seen.

The council also touched on the concept of "substantial justice," which refers to the balance between community needs and development interests. Members debated whether the proposed density of 69 units would align with the community's preference for more spacious living arrangements, as many residents move to Merrimack seeking a balance of land and community feel. The sentiment was that a lower density, such as 22 homes, might be more in line with the desires of current residents.

As the meeting concluded, it was clear that the discussions would continue, with further evaluations needed to address the concerns raised about traffic, community integrity, and the potential for investment properties. The council's ongoing deliberations will be crucial in shaping the future of housing development in Merrimack, ensuring that it aligns with the community's values and needs.