In the dimly lit meeting room of Charlestown Town Hall, community members gathered to voice their concerns about a proposed housing development that could reshape their historic village. The Planning Commission's regular meeting on November 20, 2024, was marked by passionate discussions surrounding the implications of new state laws on local zoning and density regulations.

At the heart of the meeting was a proposal for a development that could introduce up to 72 housing units in an area traditionally characterized by larger lot sizes. Residents expressed apprehension about the potential impact on their water supply, particularly as many rely on private wells. One resident, Dan Delaney, raised a critical point about the risk of his well running dry, emphasizing the need for assurances that the new development would not deplete local groundwater resources. "What is the guarantee that it won't go dry?" he asked, highlighting the uncertainty surrounding the project.

The developers acknowledged the concerns but noted that state law mandates a certain density for affordable housing projects, which complicates the situation. They explained that under current regulations, a density bonus is only available if at least 25% of the units are designated as affordable. This requirement has led to frustrations among both developers and residents, as it seems to disregard the unique characteristics of the village and its historical context.

As the meeting progressed, other residents echoed Delaney's worries, with some advocating for a return to the original zoning laws that favored larger lots. Kenneth Terranova, a long-time resident, argued that the existing R-40 zoning was established for a reason and should be preserved. "I think we should stay that way," he stated, reflecting a sentiment shared by many in attendance who fear that increased density could alter the village's character.

The developers, while open to feedback, emphasized the financial realities of constructing affordable housing. They explained that without higher density, the project would not be economically viable, as the costs associated with building affordable units often exceed the market prices they can command. This tension between community desires and economic feasibility was palpable throughout the discussions.

In response to concerns about the visual impact of the development, the developers offered to explore options for landscaping and buffering to minimize visibility from the road. They expressed a willingness to engage further with the community, suggesting additional pre-application meetings to address feedback and refine their plans.

As the meeting drew to a close, it became clear that the path forward would require careful navigation of both community interests and state mandates. The Planning Commission's decision will not only affect the immediate area but could also set a precedent for future developments in Charlestown. With the stakes high, residents left the meeting with a mix of hope and apprehension, eager to see how their voices would influence the outcome of this pivotal project.