Developer argues for zoning variance to enable housing project in Baltimore neighborhood

The Board of Municipal & Zoning Appeals meeting on April 1, 2025, focused on a significant variance request concerning a residential development project in Baltimore. The discussion centered around the viability of converting a large building into two dwelling units, with the applicant arguing that the current zoning restrictions would render the project unfeasible without a variance.

The applicant, who has over 30 years of construction experience, expressed frustration over the challenges faced since purchasing the property in 2016. He highlighted that the building's design, which includes a 13-foot ceiling and additional floors, complicates the creation of livable spaces. He argued that the proposed two units would not provide adequate living conditions, as the layout would result in cramped spaces that are not suitable for residents.

During the meeting, the applicant emphasized the need for a variance to allow for four units instead, which he believes would offer more comfortable living arrangements. He pointed out that previous attempts to develop the property as a restaurant were thwarted by zoning issues, further complicating the timeline for any development. The applicant urged the board to consider the community's need for housing and the potential benefits of the project, stating that the current state of the building is detrimental to the neighborhood.

Board members raised concerns about the extent of the variance being requested, emphasizing the importance of granting only what is necessary for the project to succeed. The applicant responded by asserting that without the requested variance, the building would remain uninhabitable and that the community deserves better living conditions.

The meeting concluded with a recognition of the challenges posed by the existing zoning laws and the need for creative solutions to address housing shortages in the area. The board will deliberate on the variance request, weighing the applicant's arguments against the city's zoning regulations and community needs.