Lawmakers debate bear hunting regulations in South Carolina to manage growing population

The South Carolina Senate Fish, Game and Forestry Committee convened on April 2, 2025, to discuss significant changes to hunting regulations, particularly concerning the management of deer hunting seasons and the growing bear population in the state. The meeting highlighted ongoing tensions between still hunters and dog hunters, as well as the implications of these changes for wildlife management.

One of the primary topics of discussion was the proposed legislation aimed at allowing still hunting for the entire two weeks of the deer season. This change is largely motivated by the increasing bear population, which has raised concerns among property owners and hunters alike. Committee members noted that the bear population has been expanding, particularly in the Upstate region, where sightings have become more frequent. The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) supports the legislation, arguing that it is a necessary adjustment to accommodate both still and dog hunting practices while addressing the bear issue.

However, the conversation revealed a complex dynamic between different hunting methods. Some committee members questioned the rationale behind changing the law instead of enforcing existing regulations that prohibit still hunting during the dog hunting period. They expressed concerns that allowing still hunting for an extended period could create conflicts with dog hunters, who traditionally rely on their dogs to track deer. The committee debated whether it was fair to extend the still hunting season without offering similar opportunities to dog hunters, who may feel disadvantaged by the proposed changes.

The discussion also touched on historical context, with references to past conflicts between still hunters and dog hunters. Some members argued that the historical demarcation between the two hunting styles was no longer relevant, suggesting that the current regulations should evolve to reflect modern hunting practices and the realities of wildlife management.

As the committee deliberated, it became clear that the proposed changes could have significant implications for hunting culture in South Carolina. The balance between accommodating different hunting methods while ensuring sustainable wildlife populations remains a critical concern. The committee's discussions will likely influence future regulations and the management of both deer and bear populations in the state.

In conclusion, the meeting underscored the complexities of wildlife management and the need for thoughtful regulation that considers the interests of various hunting communities. As the committee continues to refine its proposals, stakeholders will be watching closely to see how these changes will shape the future of hunting in South Carolina.