[{"_1":2,"_123":-5,"_124":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6087525,"mediaKeyId","2889676-343ba4191c8571ec97ddbe725387a7b1","parentId",2889676,"title","Planning staff propose CDO changes on street trees, impervious cover and use‑table corrections","audioSeconds",772,"startMs",2401000,"endMs",1629000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2889676-343ba4191c8571ec97ddbe725387a7b1&start=2401&end=1629","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2889676-343ba4191c8571ec97ddbe725387a7b1/thumbnail_2401000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6087525/Monroe-County/Indiana/Planning-staff-propose-CDO-changes-on-street-trees-impervious-cover-and-usetable-corrections","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6087525-ef047b2afe72cfe5571cbf8c4d5d4177/orig.mp4?Expires=1775638659&Signature=oDOj9E5xM-etQ560QacKb1Ak~mXHAKoGJjwQ3bM8GtyYh0c95E9YI~sr5pBsJWgR5lMn1fg9Paqcx~Fc7-SoZpCqmWsL5bE8v8FrY5xMYCMtzFIMz1qujzLtGbMfe1c-6~YjlTh3T2QwHJxp28W1F72FpRmPoQCKd4eY9YhV5uyWgW1zyaFhGzFikXect87vAxlSM2sjgRheYa4TGDfZbVJYbFmZrluQOZQkuxnvtAzVCVGihy-oZVKhzf2gi4IVWndNlLQDvWVo-6oAEdYypa1qxymd4yQ7J04CeEc8h06btlDw1cFu-Y5aymGNND9kT8dR-PK4-2xYny~nsRzfeg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Monroe County IN","date","2025-04-03T15:28:52Z","article","Monroe County planning staff outlined a package of Comprehensive Development Ordinance (CDO) text amendments at the Planning Commission’s April administrative meeting that would revise street‑tree requirements, add a separate impervious‑cover amendment, and correct inconsistencies between the ordinance use table and two‑page “2‑pager” summaries.

The amendments, presented by Tammy (planning staff), would: (1) restore and clarify references so the county’s primary use table controls in any conflict with smaller “2‑pager” summaries; (2) propose a text change on impervious cover that would alter how features such as driveways are counted; and (3) revise subdivision street‑tree standards to exempt some rural lots or allow a supplemental tree‑preservation area in lieu of street trees. Tammy said, “This is the text that we’re proposing. It is basically sweeping driveways,” and explained staff would not count driveways “if they’re going through non buildable areas, so right of way, setbacks, flagpole lots” when calculating impervious cover.

Why it matters: the changes would reduce the number of variances applicants must seek for impervious cover and alter when subdividers must plant street trees in rural settings. Planning staff framed the edits as cleanup and alignment: consultants’ links and numbering drifted in the CDO, producing inconsistencies between the authoritative use table and the shorter 2‑page summaries the public reads.

Commission discussion focused on the street‑tree policy’s practical effect in rural areas. Several commissioners asked whether the county could allow preservation of a forested area or dedicate acreage under a conservation easement instead of planting an exact number of street trees along a rural roadside. A commissioner said an acreage‑based alternative “would be easier than … going out and finding those particular trees,” and another noted enforcement limits, saying the county largely relies on aerial imagery to check compliance. Tammy acknowledged those implementation questions and said staff would try to draft a clear, easy‑to‑apply conversion for the packet's next iteration.

The commission also discussed spacing standards. The draft aligns subdivision street‑tree spacing at 40 feet (one tree every 40 feet) in subdivision plats; separate commercial site‑plan rules would retain a 35‑foot spacing standard. A commissioner noted the difference and requested clarity in the redlines.

Other technical changes included lowering documentation requirements for accessory structures—staff proposed that many accessory structures require a plot plan rather than a certified plot plan—and correcting several definition and section renumbering errors across Chapter 18 and other CDO chapters.

Staff clarified how aerial imagery is used for existing‑driveway determination: the packet references aerials from 03/11/2014 as the last known validated set for some approvals; staff also said the county received a 2024 flight and is awaiting final published 2025 imagery quality and availability. That date is used in the staff review to identify existing driveway locations and to adjudicate whether features should be counted against impervious cover.

Tammy told commissioners the impervious‑cover item was intentionally separated into its own text amendment to allow additional review by the drainage board and the stormwater program manager. She said staff will return a redline and a consolidated part‑2 packet in the next meeting packet and try to align CDO numbering to the packet’s PDF page numbers to reduce confusion.

Next steps: staff will prepare redline language and a clarified conversion method for rural alternatives (acreage/conservation in lieu of planted street trees) for the next packet, and will track outstanding comments from the drainage board and engineering reviewers.

Ending: The commission did not take formal action on the amendments at this administrative meeting; staff signaled the items will appear again in a later packet with updated redlines and clearer cross‑references.

","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Monroe County Plan Commission Administrative Meeting, April 1, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Monroe County planning staff outlined a package of CDO text amendments at an April administrative meeting that would revise street‑tree requirements, add a separate impervious‑cover amendment, and correct use‑table inconsistencies.","taxTitle","Monroe County, Indiana","taxId",3534,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6087505,"Unfinished SIA items remain open after no developer response",43,124000,167000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2889676-343ba4191c8571ec97ddbe725387a7b1&start=124&end=167","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2889676-343ba4191c8571ec97ddbe725387a7b1/thumbnail_124000.jpg","/articles/6087505/Monroe-County/Indiana/Unfinished-SIA-items-remain-open-after-no-developer-response","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6087505-2d4e680762535b3dac9b3ea31c840ed5/orig.mp4?Expires=1775638659&Signature=c5VuaYP1hyoiUJJAK9NAN8mn4WI042zlTesnVpoTirSk75urtFOdquI1G3ysxAuDdXA-axHe3mBxIVvHD9M2YXy2vOCNzEK2XhY49p4D2maYTV8wKW72sgfm~7vgR94JnHaYEUz4~z3uwkrZvDxDOLD1To0FEiYJ4MRvoC35ER4mpimQX3s1lQrjpJsdf913h~nEjK7mCUz~eC-r8KVEdJPogaVznilSzZrBIWWVSJ4ONT4hdGKrlTchT9qFhAEd3qN78hPaj8RuHXBqeEBQTJX3sjDqVhFdXKv4oeBDP9TybNH~zrOZdRu57mxNTJ9ADdikEvKOm9FsTKGIYFJhcQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Under unfinished business, planning staff reminded the commission that SIA‑22‑7 and SIA‑22‑9 remain open. Tammy said both items were heard at last month’s regular session and that staff included a summary of the discussion in the packet, but that “we have not heard of peep from the developer.”

Staff said it will check back with the developer the following week to determine whether revised materials are forthcoming and whether staff must update the packet. Commissioners requested clearer packet labeling to show whether an item is for Planning Commission approval or is a recommendation to the Board of Commissioners.

Why it matters: the outstanding SIAs are pending developer response and decisions on approval pathways; clarifying approval authority on petition forms was requested by commissioners to reduce confusion.

Next steps: staff will contact the developer and update the packet or bring the matter forward at the next meeting when new materials arrive.

Ending: No action was taken at the administrative meeting.

","Staff reported two outstanding SIA items (SIA‑22‑7 and SIA‑22‑9) previously presented at a regular session; the developer has not responded and staff will follow up before the next packet.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6087510,"Staff to correct zoning map error at 3800 West Constitution Avenue",42,80000,122000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2889676-343ba4191c8571ec97ddbe725387a7b1&start=80&end=122","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2889676-343ba4191c8571ec97ddbe725387a7b1/thumbnail_80000.jpg","/articles/6087510/Monroe-County/Indiana/Staff-to-correct-zoning-map-error-at-3800-West-Constitution-Avenue","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6087510-e7ac9c3f5d0a487767fb579d7f3cb56c/orig.mp4?Expires=1775638659&Signature=JtEBGQN0i2VMXlEaUylhAioqJRE5viCuAdCW9e~5~QG3wqAAh10uldGiKLCLGvym0g8ELNjm0aWf-77WCc6v0ANYi20BtrY34yt1aerkAGtAVXQPgPTPlIzVtu5KuR2DdTqQACKuiemhsvkHJs5WJXwUECiDPAVP5SL4p60LSBdyI~hBuRqBwZnOkVeCd4RXJyqUGaEsyIx1uowHbc6ZYQx5ukgsICjMFDLv7Xey21G2S0FlkDO1cTEWNaSsKHWv~fnMjFgFSHeqqPdlAh15IraJ82nWnMUblQDI5n2dPViCfULUQlMeVF4eSRNLTGWl0-8mEKh2WZIE1V3TYGxJKQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","At the start of administrative business, staff brought a mapping error to the Planning Commission’s attention involving a parcel at 3800 West Constitution Avenue. Tammy explained that a Cook property was rezoned in 2022 out of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and was incorrectly shown as light industrial on the zoning map.

Tammy said the error came to light after someone called about an appraisal and staff realized the map had not been corrected. She told commissioners staff will prepare an amendment to correct the zoning map and bring it to the work session for review.

Why it matters: an incorrect map designation can affect permitted uses, property valuations and permitting expectations. Staff said the matter will be presented for correction rather than being left unresolved.

Next steps: staff will draft and present a map amendment to correct the parcel’s zoning at a future work session; no formal action occurred at the administrative meeting.

Ending: Commissioners acknowledged the need for the correction; no vote was recorded.

","Planning staff reported a mapping error that in 2022 rezoned a Cook property at 3800 West Constitution Avenue out of a PUD into light industrial; staff will take an amendment to a future work session to correct the map.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6087515,"Amendment 6 to North Park PUD would create government center and Monroe County justice facility",59,852000,911000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2889676-343ba4191c8571ec97ddbe725387a7b1&start=852&end=911","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2889676-343ba4191c8571ec97ddbe725387a7b1/thumbnail_852000.jpg","/articles/6087515/Monroe-County/Indiana/Amendment-6-to-North-Park-PUD-would-create-government-center-and-Monroe-County-justice-facility","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6087515-094255ae59bc3c78df2d922051446761/orig.mp4?Expires=1775638659&Signature=ESz24y2tit~eJDIN9K10YQTguiHNCabRHklHxFBH2LYTZcIVFdFQG8K5ammdDM~ilLIIpyxBnIqkRFJtUAh6p--urWZ9bhd2fZQNymlm~2Sodt0KfKIJUkiAcb2eTLBCf-gJXT5tjUX7M69ACAYaVGfqpGZX1euHgVOQZnBfmZqKNgUdN4NCQ4V6k8ittj5krajx1KgV88bXqpMfxQ7ToD8rfcTVBMuhtjymoMcBfNFt4h~HW2zMLQbROfm0Xp67MDsYoH3QmZ98KxmdBl7GJ~sO~2MkJt86HBmJohwK9x88i9zU4ScepZ-YocT0rpGM47aFia5cqy6n9FjMD6y5Ug__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Planning Commission reviewed Amendment 6 to the North Park Planned Unit Development (PUD) at its April administrative meeting. The amendment is a substantial overhaul covering about 470 acres and would create two new districts, one designated as a government center that would allow a proposed Monroe County Justice Facility.

Staff described the amendment as a mass update to the eastern portion of the North Park PUD and said the proposal spans multiple sections, including parts of Richland Township. The item was introduced for discussion and additional staff analysis; no formal action or site‑specific approvals were taken at the administrative meeting.

Why it matters: the amendment would change allowed uses and standards over a large portion of the PUD and includes a county‑level facility that would require subsequent, specific approvals for design, site access, and infrastructure.

Next steps: staff will continue to refine the amendment and return it with additional materials and recommended findings in a future packet; commissioners were given the report for review.

Ending: No vote was recorded; the item remains in the review stage pending subsequent packets and public hearing(s).

","Planning staff introduced Amendment 6 to the North Park Planned Unit Development, a large overhaul that would create two new districts including a government center district that would allow a Monroe County justice facility. The PUD spans roughly 470 acres and includes sections within Richland Township.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6087520,"Commission hears updates on Arvin and sliding‑scale subdivisions, Freeman Fields and Highland Park Estates",443,613000,1056000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2889676-343ba4191c8571ec97ddbe725387a7b1&start=613&end=1056","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2889676-343ba4191c8571ec97ddbe725387a7b1/thumbnail_613000.jpg","/articles/6087520/Monroe-County/Indiana/Commission-hears-updates-on-Arvin-and-slidingscale-subdivisions-Freeman-Fields-and-Highland-Park-Estates","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6087520-ff574650023808b38cbdb7873d06bbc0/orig.mp4?Expires=1775638659&Signature=cV~Da0oMIf5MNkvpaKxtd7wZja9065mHHQSGI8Mi~Q62MSrA2TDB533kAiHu7dyfBnyo08QyE-ljio8DsiqAkb7LwU-r2zIhMT5smg8YEOgL7XeVfyLoQK2pfxBm9iI04Lsf9frXl7Qv8-Xo6m0CZ4p-fIzJRFI2vX7j7HNFt2bTo9zDflTbpd3SHZ5mIuA44q5tazMX2g8-TOpUKx9MaNI-rBbpHCJa0UqwFctTAvWoLurpDcwqj7lEMIh2JomjqnkOMF7lrIdk244Aep7~4bG5~prhwfaDVX5HYtza5gLgT~dkqffc2ddt9JzPliz9bm4Y7AWRssSCggtXi2qoJw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Monroe County planning staff briefed the Planning Commission on multiple subdivision and plat items during the April administrative meeting, including the Arvin Subdivision, a separate sliding‑scale subdivision proposal, updates on Freeman Fields and a site walk and corrective timeline for Highland Park Estates.

Arvin Subdivision: Tammy reported the Arvin lot is seeking a utility waiver for an existing line and a street‑tree waiver. Plat committee members reviewed the matter last Thursday; the packet was published before that committee met, and staff said the committee’s recommendation will be reflected in the next regular packet. Tammy said the committee’s initial finding was a “no recommendation” and that staff will update the report with the committee’s final recommendation.

Sliding‑scale subdivision: A second subdivision in the packet seeks to split two existing lots into three. Staff described outstanding information requests: a possible street‑tree waiver if required trees fall outside the right‑of‑way, a road‑width waiver tied to an average‑daily‑traffic count (staff requested corrected traffic counts) and an access concern for Lot 11 where a driveway must skirt a sinkhole. Staff said they initially recommended a shared driveway but are still gathering data and will update the staff report before the regular session.

Freeman Fields and Highland Park Estates: Staff said the transfer of ownership on Freeman Fields appears to be progressing and could lead to renewed activity on finishing that subdivision; staff referred commissioners to Jackie’s report for details and said they are monitoring progress. Regarding Highland Park Estates, four to five county staff conducted an on‑site review and told the commission they expect the developer to work toward corrections and completion; staff said they will attempt to have corrections finished by December and that a performance‑period extension was under consideration with a target date of 2025‑08‑25 included in the report.

Why it matters: the items affect lot development standards, required improvements, and the timeline for subdivisions bringing infrastructure and housing to completion. Several matters will return with updated staff recommendations and corrected technical data.

Next steps: staff will update the Arvin and sliding‑scale staff reports with the plat committee’s recommendation, corrected traffic counts where applicable, and any street‑tree waiver requests; Highland Park Estates and Freeman Fields will continue to be monitored and reported back as the developers submit as‑builts and remedial plans.

Ending: No formal votes were taken; commissioners asked for updated staff reports in the next regular meeting packet.

","Staff reported utility and street‑tree waiver requests for the Arvin subdivision, a sliding‑scale subdivision seeking three lots and waivers, and updates on Freeman Fields and Highland Park Estates performance and ownership. Plat committee reviews prompted additional information requests; staff will update recommendation in the regular packet.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Planning staff propose CDO changes on street trees, impervious cover and use‑table corrections

Unfinished SIA items remain open after no developer response

Staff to correct zoning map error at 3800 West Constitution Avenue

Amendment 6 to North Park PUD would create government center and Monroe County justice facility

Commission hears updates on Arvin and sliding‑scale subdivisions, Freeman Fields and Highland Park Estates