On April 7, 2025, the Pennsylvania Legislature introduced House Bill 350, a significant piece of legislation aimed at regulating surrogacy agreements within the state. The bill seeks to clarify the rights and responsibilities of all parties involved in surrogacy arrangements, addressing a growing need for legal clarity in this area.

The primary purpose of House Bill 350 is to establish a legal framework for surrogacy agreements, ensuring that both surrogates and intended parents understand their rights and obligations. Key provisions of the bill include stipulations regarding the payment of reasonable expenses related to surrogacy, as well as the prohibition of assignment of rights under these agreements, ensuring that only the child is recognized as a beneficiary.

Notably, the bill includes specific clauses that address the impact of changes in marital status on the validity of surrogacy agreements. For instance, it states that the marriage or divorce of either the surrogate or intended parents after the agreement is signed does not affect the agreement's validity, unless explicitly stated otherwise. This provision aims to protect the integrity of the surrogacy arrangement amidst personal changes in the lives of the parties involved.

The introduction of House Bill 350 has sparked considerable debate among lawmakers and advocacy groups. Supporters argue that the bill provides essential protections for all parties and promotes ethical practices in surrogacy. Conversely, opponents express concerns about potential exploitation of surrogates and the implications of commodifying childbirth. Amendments to the bill are anticipated as discussions continue, particularly regarding the financial aspects of surrogacy and the rights of surrogates.

The economic implications of House Bill 350 are also noteworthy. By establishing clear guidelines for surrogacy, the bill could potentially foster a more regulated surrogacy market in Pennsylvania, attracting intended parents from other states and generating economic activity. However, the social implications are equally significant, as the bill raises questions about the ethical dimensions of surrogacy and the rights of women who choose to become surrogates.

As House Bill 350 progresses through the legislative process, its outcomes could reshape the landscape of surrogacy in Pennsylvania, balancing the interests of intended parents with the rights and protections of surrogates. The ongoing discussions and potential amendments will be crucial in determining the final form of the legislation and its impact on families across the state.