On April 7, 2025, the Pennsylvania Legislature introduced House Bill 350, a significant piece of legislation aimed at streamlining the process of establishing paternity through genetic testing. This bill addresses the complexities surrounding paternity disputes, which can have profound implications for child support, custody, and family law.

The primary purpose of House Bill 350 is to facilitate genetic testing when paternity is contested. Under the proposed law, any party involved in a paternity action can request genetic testing, supported by a sworn statement. The bill mandates that the court or domestic relations section require the child and the parties involved to undergo these tests. Notably, if the initial test results indicate a 99% or greater probability of paternity, this creates a presumption of paternity that can only be challenged by clear and convincing evidence regarding the reliability of the test results.

To ensure the integrity of the testing process, the bill stipulates that genetic tests must be conducted by certified laboratories, with strict adherence to maintaining the chain of custody for the specimens. This provision aims to bolster the reliability of the results, which are crucial in legal proceedings. Furthermore, the domestic relations section is responsible for covering the costs of the tests, with the possibility of recouping these expenses from the alleged father if paternity is confirmed.

The introduction of House Bill 350 has sparked discussions among lawmakers and stakeholders. Proponents argue that the bill will simplify and expedite paternity determinations, ultimately benefiting children by providing clarity regarding their parental relationships. Critics, however, raise concerns about the potential for misuse of genetic testing and the implications of presuming paternity based on statistical probabilities alone.

The economic implications of this bill are noteworthy, as establishing paternity can directly affect child support obligations and the allocation of state resources for welfare programs. By clarifying paternity, the bill may lead to more efficient child support collections and reduce the financial burden on the state.

As House Bill 350 moves through the legislative process, its potential impact on family law in Pennsylvania remains a focal point of debate. Legal experts suggest that if passed, the bill could set a precedent for how paternity is established in other states, reflecting a growing trend towards using genetic testing as a standard practice in family law cases.

In conclusion, House Bill 350 represents a significant shift in the approach to paternity disputes in Pennsylvania. As discussions continue, stakeholders will be closely monitoring its progress and the broader implications for families and the legal system in the state.