Plymouth conservation land permit faces citizen challenges over historic site violations

In a tense meeting at Plymouth City Hall, community members voiced their concerns over a controversial land permit that has sparked significant debate regarding historical preservation and environmental protection. The discussions centered around the Cedarville Conservation Area, a site with deep historical ties to the Wampanoag people, who have inhabited the region for over 11,000 years.

A key point raised was the failure to conduct an archaeological study before the issuance of a permit for development. Critics highlighted that the building commissioner had received prior written notice about the site's historical significance, yet the necessary checks were not completed. This oversight has raised alarms among residents, who argue that the land's rich heritage and archaeological features warrant stringent protections.

The meeting revealed that the Cedarville Conservation Area was designated for conservation in 1993, a decision made unanimously by the town meeting. However, recent actions by the town to transfer this land for commercial use have been called into question. Opponents of the transfer argue that it violates Article 97 of the Massachusetts Constitution, which mandates a two-thirds legislative vote for any conversion of conservation land. They contend that the town's failure to adhere to this requirement undermines the integrity of local governance and environmental laws.

Adding to the controversy, it was disclosed that the land was sold to the Plymouth Foundation for a mere dollar, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest, as several members of the foundation also hold municipal positions. This has led to accusations of impropriety and calls for transparency in the dealings surrounding the land.

Residents have expressed their intent to take legal action under Massachusetts' citizen suit law, which allows for lawsuits to protect the environment from violations of law. Over 29 residents have indicated their willingness to challenge the town's decisions, seeking to halt further degradation of the property.

As the meeting transitioned to public comment, the atmosphere remained charged with emotion and urgency. Community members are rallying to protect their heritage and the environment, emphasizing the need for accountability and adherence to legal protocols in land use decisions. The outcome of this situation could have lasting implications for both the preservation of historical sites and the governance of land use in Plymouth.