Wildlife Division clarifies deer and elk population classification methods in Utah

Utah's Wildlife Board convened on April 8, 2025, to discuss critical wildlife management strategies, focusing on population estimates, classification methods, and the implications for hunting regulations. A key takeaway from the meeting was the need for clearer communication regarding wildlife population data, as many stakeholders often confuse classification data with raw counts and population estimates.

During the session, wildlife biologists explained the terminology used in population management. Classification provides a demographic snapshot, detailing ratios such as male-to-female and young-to-adult animals, which is essential for understanding population dynamics. In contrast, counts represent the raw number of animals observed during aerial surveys, which are then adjusted for visibility conditions to estimate total populations.

The board highlighted the importance of accurate population estimates for managing species like elk and pronghorn. For elk, the current population estimate stands at approximately 83,760, slightly above the statewide objective of 80,000. The board noted that elk populations have remained stable, with a consistent approach to managing antlerless harvests to maintain population levels.

Pronghorn management was also a focal point, with the current population estimated at 13,750, significantly below the objective of over 20,000. The board discussed the challenges of conducting aerial surveys and the potential shift towards more reliance on modeling due to rising costs associated with survey flights.

The meeting concluded with discussions on the upcoming mid-plan reviews for elk management and the implementation of a new statewide deer management plan, which aims to address declining deer populations. The board emphasized the importance of ongoing data collection and analysis to inform future management decisions and ensure sustainable wildlife populations in Utah.

As the Wildlife Board moves forward, stakeholders can expect continued efforts to refine management strategies and enhance communication regarding wildlife data, ultimately benefiting both the ecosystem and the hunting community.