In a recent press briefing held by the Department of State, officials addressed significant changes to U.S. foreign aid, particularly concerning the World Food Programme (WFP) and USAID funding. The discussions unfolded against a backdrop of rising concerns about the effectiveness and accountability of aid distribution in conflict zones like Yemen and Afghanistan.
A key point raised was the assertion that 85% of existing USAID programs with the WFP remain active, countering claims that the U.S. has drastically cut its support. Officials emphasized that while some programs were terminated, particularly in Yemen and Afghanistan, these decisions were made to prevent funds from inadvertently supporting terrorist groups such as the Houthis and the Taliban. The U.S. has paused food assistance in Northern Yemen and intermittently suspended aid in Afghanistan to mitigate these risks.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The briefing also highlighted a shift in the administration's approach to aid, moving away from cash-based assistance due to concerns over misuse and a lack of accountability. This change aims to ensure that American taxpayer dollars are used effectively and responsibly.
As the conversation shifted to diplomatic efforts, questions arose regarding indirect talks with Iran, led by Special Envoy Steve Witkoff. While the State Department refrained from confirming details provided by Iranian officials, they reiterated the importance of the ongoing discussions and referred to President Trump's remarks for further context.
This press briefing encapsulated the complexities of U.S. foreign aid and diplomacy, illustrating the balancing act between providing humanitarian assistance and ensuring national security. As the situation evolves, the implications of these funding decisions and diplomatic efforts will continue to resonate on the global stage.