Winchester advocates support 80¢ tax rate for public services funding

During the Winchester City Council meeting on April 8, 2025, the discussion centered around the proposed property tax rate, with many residents advocating for an increase to 80 cents per $100 of assessed value. This rate is seen as essential for fully funding public services, particularly schools, public safety, and infrastructure.

Laura Baker Ganderly, a local teacher and vice president of the Winchester Education Association, passionately urged the council to support a tax rate that would adequately fund the school budget, emphasizing the long-term benefits for the community's future. "What you do now affects our future," she stated, highlighting the importance of investing in education.

Delia Delgado Ordell echoed this sentiment, arguing that a tax rate of 80 cents is a reasonable investment for maintaining the city's quality of life. She pointed out that underfunding essential services could lead to greater costs down the line, particularly in light of inflation and a housing shortage. "We can't solve those challenges by underfunding services," she warned.

Other residents, including Sadie Bell and Martha Delgado, reinforced the need for a higher tax rate to ensure the city can maintain its amenities and services. Bell noted that taxes are a necessary part of living in a community that offers quality services, while Delgado compared city funding to caring for a home, stating, "We need strong schools, clean parks, reliable infrastructure, and well-supported public safety."

Benjamin Rothamal, a small business owner and parent, highlighted the unique opportunity to lower the tax rate while still increasing revenue due to recent property reassessments. He argued that an 80-cent rate would allow for necessary investments in public schools and infrastructure without placing an undue burden on residents.

The council is currently considering a tax rate of 79 cents, which would fund essential services but may not fully meet the community's needs. City Manager Dan Hoffman indicated that while the 79-cent rate would allow for some funding, it would require cuts to certain positions and services. He noted that an increase to 80 cents would provide additional revenue to support critical roles and infrastructure improvements.

As the council deliberates, the voices of residents advocating for a higher tax rate reflect a broader concern for the city's future and the quality of life for its residents. The decision on the tax rate will not only impact the current budget but also set the tone for future funding and community development.