[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6610778,"mediaKeyId","2901482-043832f4686186533cb27d9ba13fd63d","parentId",2901482,"title","Votes at a glance: Clinton City Council actions, April 5, 2025","audioSeconds",179,"startMs",722000,"endMs",901000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2901482-043832f4686186533cb27d9ba13fd63d&start=722&end=901","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2901482-043832f4686186533cb27d9ba13fd63d/thumbnail_722000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6610778/Clinton-City/Clinton-County/Iowa/Votes-at-a-glance-Clinton-City-Council-actions-April-5-2025","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6610778-213b3553592b4ad7262e64b8e2542069/orig.mp4?Expires=1775171037&Signature=EcFdgm~WDNJIEb7OKNsqnv~8ZSXHV8zGz0wskJMJ7SBiOmVVw3ORPKzl7NM3j0f3BKUqWM~izyh0XtF2jRRdP82V4Ufhv0CbP9ED5msocRLaYgs8CSVafga7yPV2JAKNMIPARs23LARJ5Yd4qXD6zA91DiN5-zDq3aIc6puvShidUE3cdINuP-agadRJZZVA5bkCsOHolL9GgZ0VyE9eSFkoLF0CoUboQNilO7UkTS4T88jHn-5qnbZhFyeFDABWKpW7cz4eVcbZQnYo3sHgDj~UHMLSgSWp8t~tZJEN-GCMsx~TDsPgZoU1EvOKHwCKPZCWdydcrwluEMVJH-FCmQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Clinton","date","2025-04-08T22:48:09.79Z","article","The Clinton City Council took multiple formal actions April 5. Below is a brief summary of each item recorded in the meeting minutes.

- Submission of public transit grant applications: Council member Oberyn moved to adopt a resolution approving submission of public transit grant applications. Council discussion noted the update increased the award by about $67,000. The resolution was adopted by roll call (vote recorded as unanimous in the minutes).

- Sale of vacated north-south alley adjacent to 3129 Garfield Street: The council approved a resolution authorizing the sale of a vacated portion of the north-south alley adjacent to 3129 Garfield Street to Ed Leasing for $1,990, as described by the legal description read aloud. The resolution was adopted by roll call.

- Consent agenda and claims: The council approved the consent agenda and claims listings as presented during the meeting.

- Appointments to boards and commissions: The council approved mayoral recommendations, including reappointments and new appointments to the Civil Service Commission, Finance Committee, Historic Preservation Commission, Traffic Safety Commission and noted vacancies on other boards. Specific names read into the record included David Brown (Civil Service Commission), Brent Albertson (Finance Committee), Erin Everson (Historic Preservation Commission) and Patty Howard (Traffic Safety Commission).

- Resolution setting public hearing on FY2025-26 operating budget: The council set a public hearing date for the FY2025-26 operating budget; the resolution was approved by roll call.

- Sale of city-owned property at 549 Third Avenue South: The council adopted a resolution of intent to accept an offer from Linda Knothdorf in the amount of $5,000 and set a public hearing on the proposed sale at 549 Third Avenue South; the resolution was adopted.

- Ordinances and first readings: The council advanced several ordinances to first consideration, including a code update pertaining to sidewalks and an amendment to city code Section 34.22 regarding fire requirements. The sidewalk ordinance was read and advanced on first consideration; subsequent readings are required.

- Riverfront study and sewer loan meeting: The council adopted a resolution approving the riverfront development study (described on the resolution as a \"riverfront development study master plan\") and adopted a resolution fixing a date for a meeting to consider issuance of not-to-exceed $1,884,000 in sewer revenue capital loan notes; both resolutions were adopted by roll call (see separate articles for detailed discussion and vote tallies where recorded).

The minutes show individual roll-call results for many items; when a roll call was read aloud, the clerk recorded yes/no responses. For items where the minutes recorded dissent, those votes are noted in the related article. Where the clerk's roll call indicated unanimous approval, the item is listed as adopted without further breakdown.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Regular City Council - Apr 08 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Summary of formal votes and actions taken by the Clinton City Council at the April 5 meeting, including grant submissions, property sales, appointments and ordinance readings.","taxTitle","Clinton City, Clinton County, Iowa","taxId",55531,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6610783,"Council advances sidewalk ordinance to first reading after public comment raises equity and maintenance concerns",1808,833000,2641000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2901482-043832f4686186533cb27d9ba13fd63d&start=833&end=2641","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2901482-043832f4686186533cb27d9ba13fd63d/thumbnail_833000.jpg","/articles/6610783/Clinton-City/Clinton-County/Iowa/Council-advances-sidewalk-ordinance-to-first-reading-after-public-comment-raises-equity-and-maintenance-concerns","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6610783-47622f94bca7c3fce96648431f2c990a/orig.mp4?Expires=1775171037&Signature=HYGh0QIUI6m591F1g481w3M4sUFl9eqS--ByeGLe025RM3wZlOt3jkCD6~hAUELmmT6iWEOYQvXtOtZPxkLb~r~54QgLZugddJoEa5dHsO1EWOmb6lGUZvKHbmkUbol6UBMRK-FzDNbe272JB44L2oSPxpC08-W3~l71RKrBkY20YI3cjxXaMwp91cVPyqdL6sQpgOCoMXQ0EjD6RQ7AI7NtT6lG99S5qyddkmAXmUGcOTAASsmFgduYpz9ay2eu2rDbeeNqIu-w2xao3ZAbQOgXdoVk~m72SbjnO3CxvZTJL0c63RDrL0FxfcLfnPoX7aP5Yyn~WEK1sKd7jWGvdg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Clinton City Council moved an amendment to the city code pertaining to sidewalks to first consideration April 5 and heard public comment urging a broader approach to sidewalk maintenance and funding.

Resident Robert Mueller told the council the city's sidewalk policy has been inconsistently enforced for decades and urged a universal approach funded across all taxpayers. \"Why don't we address it completely and make it fair to everyone in this city? If that's a dollar for a sidewalk fee for every property taxpayer in this city,\" Mueller said. He also raised concerns about winter plow operations burying sidewalks.

Council members discussed enforcement, cost, and practical barriers including parkway trees that lift sidewalks. One member recommended the city engineering department inventory problem areas and move forward; another emphasized performing separate readings for each ordinance passage. The council advanced the ordinance on first consideration; members said more detailed readings and implementation steps will follow.

The ordinance title read at the meeting referenced amending the city code regarding sidewalks (title read aloud during first consideration). Council members said the city must be prepared to fix sidewalks the municipality is responsible for and noted that some residents will likely repair sidewalks voluntarily after notice.

The ordinance passed first consideration by roll call; subsequent readings will follow before final adoption. The meeting transcript records a mix of support for action and concern about the city's long-term maintenance obligations and potential costs.","The council advanced a sidewalk ordinance amendment to first consideration and heard public comment criticizing unequal enforcement and concerns about winter maintenance and program costs.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6610786,"Council adopts riverfront study despite objections over housing proposals in park area",561,1889000,2450000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2901482-043832f4686186533cb27d9ba13fd63d&start=1889&end=2450","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2901482-043832f4686186533cb27d9ba13fd63d/thumbnail_1889000.jpg","/articles/6610786/Clinton-City/Clinton-County/Iowa/Council-adopts-riverfront-study-despite-objections-over-housing-proposals-in-park-area","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6610786-541613d8c782b2ee5888c25c49fea45c/orig.mp4?Expires=1775171037&Signature=ZKwIgOeYXJyvu66Hmi18D8woC1MTd8taPNruCADJhHX9npsmK-wZFGKsJZ5AmBOwh992RQjkIQ9I946eUud6me4ZKMXuhPkGbv6pUAK~pDc1Q0YBhNgmdcwBrbVGLFGUKeN7uPo-BH8JeqrQAmj~B5J8-hJbxjJSVIo87vp3gASKFkZu~0AXUvQjCzv8dNiJmpEyZs3TaLEYBLMZGcY-BwUz5SLIDfdGodfgq4rUfbmNmNtdG1ffYCPOzatVzJDLS0TLmMHDRj4C9uqhhmWRvHgV0ulXC9d~SNjtxjHGzXtqMjHpNSivVI2r-~yTgH~b0NURFxEuZJ9evc8lkLa2Og__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Clinton City Council voted to adopt a riverfront development study presented as the \"riverfront development study master plan\" on April 5, despite objections from council members and concern from residents about conceptual housing shown in parts of the study.

Council members debated whether the document should be accepted as a study or labeled a master plan and whether the North and South ends of the riverfront should be considered separately. \"The idea in Riverview Park of housing is not very favorable,\" Council member Oberg said, adding that a recent ordinance requires a public vote before nonrecreational uses can replace parkland. \"That's never gonna happen because of our recent ordinance,\" she said.

Council member McCurries said the study did not match his expectations for a river-oriented amenities study. \"When we talked about doing this riverfront study ... it was to determine whether things should be incorporated or done instead of North River Drive,\" he said. McCurries urged the council to consider separating the study into two votes, one for the north end and one for the south end, because he said he opposed the south-end concepts.

Other council members and staff characterized the document as a long-range vision based on public input collected by the study team. \"This is just a study. It's going to sit on the shelf like the old one did, and if we ever get to do something,\" one council member said, noting the plan reflected comments, sticky notes and surveys from citizens.

Council members also recorded concerns about perception and the reaction from citizens who opposed any suggestion of selling parkland. One member said they received multiple phone calls from citizens worried about proposed changes to the pony baseball field.

The motion to adopt the study passed with five votes in favor and two opposed. Council member Shearers moved the resolution; a second was recorded but not named in the minutes. Several council members said the study should not be taken as a commitment to immediate development and emphasized it represents a long-term vision rather than an adopted engineering or construction plan.

The adoption resolves only the study document; any future project on parkland would still be subject to the city's ordinances and public-notice requirements, council members said.","Clinton City Council adopted a riverfront development study described on the resolution as a \"riverfront development study master plan,\" drawing objections from several council members and some citizens about possible housing on Riverview Park's south end.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6610791,"Council schedules loan meeting as wastewater expansion planning moves forward amid biogas debate",614,1227000,1841000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2901482-043832f4686186533cb27d9ba13fd63d&start=1227&end=1841","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2901482-043832f4686186533cb27d9ba13fd63d/thumbnail_1227000.jpg","/articles/6610791/Clinton-City/Clinton-County/Iowa/Council-schedules-loan-meeting-as-wastewater-expansion-planning-moves-forward-amid-biogas-debate","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6610791-2078359e7b9af127565b4caf6f2cb7fb/orig.mp4?Expires=1775171037&Signature=oFfFXZkpLIX3q49cL3C2dBg3I0YZDQUpOH--ZV~60KJ50a3Lx6pMEOW35QmcZTU2X1MfTWLKadg71feKmpNsrwHyAgr-eHKzLrWPCQYNt~9DmPvFugzfc-~gB46EvWF1X64xH25TbZNsYbCsvi9ZnQj0ryyLd8M8qCgVc2~ysgkioAmC~LbRFRgeosIOrfjhuTz95bAoAjsR-rxdM5FHW6Qv-tIUBJ4WXjUToXveiMXWpm6cvYJry8B3uwoSkTvd4G8vias6HoQ0v4y1G6zsek4onHR5D08mAYEIzcHjUJ7l~Aw1Xjev4zEO2-M9EX3P9QS8-gnGfaHdJZvQ98k2vg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Clinton City Council on April 5 adopted a resolution setting a meeting date to authorize a loan and disbursement agreement and the issuance of not-to-exceed $1,884,000 in sewer revenue capital loan notes, and heard extended discussion about options to produce and use biogas from the city's wastewater treatment plant expansion.

Council members and city staff framed the action as a near-term financing step to advance design and planning that will determine whether the plant's biogas is routed into the regional pipeline or used on-site.

City staff said the federal program currently tied to the project could bring roughly $27.9 million in tax credits if the city moves forward with a biogas system. \"The why is there's $27,900,000 federal tax credit that is out there if if we move forward with the biogas portion,\" a city staff member told the council. The staff member added that the design work will include two routing options: sending processed gas into the pipeline or routing it back into the plant for on-site use.

The staff member also described cost and timing considerations tied to the wider plant expansion, which the council has been funding in partnership with an industrial user identified in the meeting as ADM. The city reported an original contract cap of $135 million; the project currently sits near $130 million, and staff told the council they expect to request roughly $4 million more to finish remaining work. An unexpected sludge cost of about $1.5 million was also mentioned in the discussion.

Council members asked about timing and whether the plant should be completed first. \"I don't think it's a bad idea either, but I'm concerned that I think we need the plant should be up and operational and we should take one thing at a time,\" Council member Davis said. The city staff replied that design work is needed now to preserve eligibility for the federal tax credit and to assess the relative costs of pipeline interconnection versus on-site reuse.

Officials said the design and planning step the council approved will provide figures for those options and better define anticipated costs; the meeting included a question about a $1.8 million figure for immediate design work and a staff reply that the city had the needed authority to proceed. The staff member said the design will show \"what it will cost to create biogas to produce it\" and will provide the data needed to decide whether to route gas into the pipeline or back into the plant.

The council voting record on the resolution to fix the loan authorization meeting showed five votes in favor and two opposed. Council member Shemmers moved the resolution; a second was recorded but not named in the minutes. The resolution authorizes publication of notice regarding issuance of the loan notes; the loan authorization meeting date will determine whether the city proceeds with that borrowing step.

What this does and does not do: the council did not adopt the biogas construction contract at the meeting. The item advanced procedural authorization for financing that staff said is intended to support planning and later borrowing tied to the plant expansion and rate structure changes for industrial customers.

The council and staff said a loan or loans to finish the plant will be repaid through industrial rates only, not residential rates, and that rate-setting will be returned to the council when needed. Staff also said they are seeking clarification from state and federal representatives about how the tax-credit funds would be allocated and whether partial credit would be available if project components are completed in phases.

The action and discussion were part of a longer utility and capital project briefing that included multiple motions and subsequent votes on related agenda items.","Clinton City Council adopted a resolution fixing a date to authorize up to $1.884 million in sewer revenue capital loan notes and heard extended discussion about biogas options, federal tax credits and project costs tied to the city's wastewater treatment plant expansion.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Clinton City Council actions, April 5, 2025

Council advances sidewalk ordinance to first reading after public comment raises equity and maintenance concerns

Council adopts riverfront study despite objections over housing proposals in park area

Council schedules loan meeting as wastewater expansion planning moves forward amid biogas debate