Fremont County opposes Colorado Senate Bill 25-003 citing unfunded mandates and constitutional concerns

The Fremont County Board of County Commissioners convened on April 8, 2025, to discuss significant legislative concerns, particularly focusing on a resolution opposing Colorado Senate Bill 25-003. This bill, which has already passed the Colorado legislature, aims to impose strict regulations on the sale and ownership of semi-automatic firearms.

Commissioner McFall led the discussion, expressing strong opposition to the bill, labeling it as an infringement on Second Amendment rights and an unfunded mandate that would burden local law enforcement. He highlighted that the bill requires extensive background checks and safety courses, which could impose significant costs on the sheriff's department without additional funding. McFall noted that the technology needed for compliance is not yet available, raising concerns about the feasibility of implementing the bill within the proposed timeline.

The resolution outlines various objections to the bill, including its potential to harm local gun store owners and the economic impact on the community. The commissioners emphasized that the bill would create unnecessary hurdles for law-abiding citizens wishing to exercise their rights to bear arms. They argued that the focus should instead be on addressing mental health issues, which they believe are at the root of gun violence, rather than imposing stricter gun laws.

The board unanimously approved the resolution, urging Governor Jared Polis to veto the legislation before the April 13 deadline. They expressed hope that public pressure through calls and emails to the governor's office could influence his decision.

In addition to the resolution, the meeting included the appointment of Kevin Brown to the Fremont County Board of Zoning Adjustment, marking a promotion from his previous role as an alternate member.

The discussions at this meeting reflect ongoing tensions in Colorado regarding gun legislation and the balance between public safety and individual rights. The board's actions signify a commitment to advocating for local interests in the face of state-level regulations.