Officer McComas details arrest of Jaylen Bell and seizure of handgun

In a significant court session on April 8, 2025, Judge Stephanie Boyd presided over the 187th District Court as the jury heard the case of the State vs. McIntyre. The proceedings focused on the testimony of law enforcement officers regarding the arrest of an individual named Jaylen Bell, who was detained in connection with a handgun and other charges.

During the testimony, an officer recounted the events leading to Bell's arrest on May 7, 2017. The officer explained that after running a name through the system and receiving a "no records found" response, he approached Bell, who was in a taxi. Concerned for safety, the officer conducted a pat-down search, during which he discovered a bulge in Bell's waistband that he identified as a handgun. The officer's training led him to believe the object was indeed a firearm, prompting immediate action to secure Bell and prevent any potential threat.

The handgun, identified as a black 9mm Smith and Wesson, was subsequently seized and placed into evidence. The officer confirmed that Bell was arrested not only for possession of the firearm but also for having a small amount of marijuana and for providing fictitious information as a fugitive from justice. The officer's detailed account included the serial number of the weapon, which was confirmed during the proceedings.

The defense questioned the officer about the evidence storage procedures in Dallas County, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the integrity of evidence. The officer affirmed that firearms are stored separately in an armory section, ensuring they remain in the condition they were found.

As the trial progresses, the implications of this case extend beyond the immediate charges against Bell. It raises questions about law enforcement protocols, the handling of evidence, and the broader issues of gun possession and public safety. The jury's deliberation will ultimately determine the outcome of this case, which reflects ongoing societal concerns regarding firearms and criminal justice. The next witness, David Pendleton, a firearms examiner from the Bexar County Crime Lab, is expected to provide further insights into the evidence presented.