Cleveland Council hears opposition to proposed gas station zoning change near schools

The Cleveland City Council's Development, Planning, and Sustainability Committee held a heated meeting on April 8, 2025, where community members voiced strong opposition to a proposed zoning change that could allow a gas station to be built near Caddell Park, an area frequented by children and families. Residents expressed deep concerns about public safety, environmental impacts, and the potential for increased traffic in an already congested area.

During the public comment portion, several speakers highlighted the dangers posed by placing a gas station adjacent to a park and an elementary school. Paula First, a local resident, emphasized the negative consequences of the zoning change, questioning the motivations behind the city's negotiations for the property. She urged the council to prioritize the community's interests over potential benefits for a single property owner.

Nikki Hudson, another resident, recounted her experience protesting the gas station proposal, noting that traffic accidents occurred during their demonstrations, underscoring the intersection's dangers. Other speakers echoed these sentiments, with many citing the Environmental Protection Agency's recommendation that gas stations be located at least 1,000 feet from schools, a guideline that the proposed site does not meet.

Community members also raised concerns about the historical significance of the area, arguing that a gas station does not align with the neighborhood's character or needs. They called for developments that would benefit all residents, rather than just a select few.

Councilman Jay Westbrook acknowledged the importance of public input, suggesting that the committee should consider the depth of community concerns before making a decision. He urged that any additional comments from the public be reviewed thoroughly before a vote is taken.

As the meeting concluded, it was clear that the proposed zoning change has sparked significant community engagement, with residents advocating for their safety and the preservation of their neighborhood's integrity. The committee's next steps will be crucial in determining the future of this contentious issue, as they weigh the voices of the community against the interests of property negotiations.