[{"_1":2,"_100":-5,"_101":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6083017,"mediaKeyId","2935467-1f88c233803285b2011faf6b76155ecc","parentId",2935467,"title","Council votes: variance denied, street closures approved, camera contract and annexation service resolution pass","audioSeconds",233,"startMs",7955000,"endMs",8188000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2935467-1f88c233803285b2011faf6b76155ecc&start=7955&end=8188","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2935467-1f88c233803285b2011faf6b76155ecc/thumbnail_7955000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6083017/Ohio/Council-votes-variance-denied-street-closures-approved-camera-contract-and-annexation-service-resolution-pass","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6083017-16745689c0fa927337ad2749a944a13e/orig.mp4?Expires=1770495942&Signature=hFI6gk0xvNu4rhDw56k0VHZsjHG89n9ITtMZXbgKOqn2N6Ha5w6X6jhDR1D~~AMK86SMrenbbZFouqM~lYJGw8Gy1g~xS2dHEhHVuTAMjxFrGFfYnsS-LxA54BrvsuLJ3x4CJgo1WTmH8VvuWfY2pafY38PkLnaLX~Q1UywyxxcpnYFqJ2U1eg8f~SnGHJqwR84MF1o5Aq1O~mPfJV7WLLAYbdFjXJIHPwos8yvWABpGw7Wb2apBCUPHrNMgwOBBrDAzc8QLX-3dri40MJSqyBGzqMnEagqk7XabMDxXpEqUAwjmwr6SGWr2qGvUIpp4czmTrciEkOE1Se2oNWA6Tw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Village Council of Commercial Point OH","date","2025-04-08T16:35:43Z","article","At its meeting the Commercial Point Village Council took several formal actions on development, public‑safety and budget items.

What council decided
- Variance denied (233 Victorian Drive): Council voted to deny a variance request for 233 Victorian Drive. Motion to deny was made by Council member Eric and seconded by Jay; roll call recorded unanimous support and the chair instructed staff to proceed with enforcement and follow‑up paperwork.

- Street closures for QFM motorcycle events (July): Council approved a request to close sections of downtown streets for a four‑night motorcycle event in July (requested closure 5–10 p.m.; village to place signs and manage closures). Motion by Jay, second by Ross; vote passed 4–2. Council discussed officer coverage and trash/porta‑potty/vendor logistics and asked staff to include conditions in the closure agreement.

- Police camera service agreement (Flock Group): Council adopted a resolution authorizing the mayor to enter a service agreement with Flock Group Inc. to provide camera services for the police department. Council waived readings and approved the contract by roll call (unanimous yes).

- Annexation service statement (344.391 acres): Council adopted a statement of services for a proposed annexation of roughly 344.39 acres from Scioto Township into the village and declared an emergency for filing under the Ohio Revised Code process. The vote passed 4–2; councilors who voted no cited concern about obligating village services before development commitments were finalized.

- Sewer fund appropriation: Council approved an increase in sewer fund appropriations associated with loan proceeds and utility planning; roll call vote passed unanimously.

Procedural notes: Council also amended an existing rezoning packet (ordinance 2024-03) to incorporate the latest exhibits; that amendment was approved by roll call. A subsequent motion to adopt the rezoning ordinance failed for lack of a motion.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","04/07/2025 Council Meeting","oneSentenceSummary","At the May 6 meeting the council denied a variance at 233 Victorian Drive, approved four July street closures for a motorcycle event, approved a police camera services contract, and adopted a service statement for a 344-acre annexation; two measures involved split votes.","taxTitle","Commercial Point Village, Pickaway County, Ohio","taxId",75799,"location","Ohio","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6083023,"Developers outline temporary sewer tie‑in for Keaton Hill parcel; council seeks protections",751,4112000,4863000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2935467-1f88c233803285b2011faf6b76155ecc&start=4112&end=4863","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2935467-1f88c233803285b2011faf6b76155ecc/thumbnail_4112000.jpg","/articles/6083023/Ohio/Developers-outline-temporary-sewer-tiein-for-Keaton-Hill-parcel-council-seeks-protections","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6083023-d47ce311b0ee2501c337cc57ab083f2f/orig.mp4?Expires=1770495942&Signature=SaFiOYjcp-kRJXWmCk9RuCtkttqBlzxcgrxfC0YPP9vrykxsvbbnuMrA8XlcHjo1YDTIs5TxXXmuLAHHSiKjh5zJBmXE7LOZjIpm8VamsVJmz7FTe6nbpx0L6kSVcIb1isqqrVGsXHbBL-g6niPQuXB-na5pjp5jmSDofR7Y~6IWnUL4OByXgvzhmQg9igkVzL2WS8AW9WkwrJIH3OGZnUq2CgAGKxX1s9xPxR1tSaefPD5~w5B1udL0kI2eeQcxV2De786~hEnhmcRBUhcMpX4~2-jzJHxMroXUw0Ocp2XPk3rshLKkKjVh2B2xJjgR2VuDHQQUo3lJvrqeWnopMg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Developer representatives described a preliminary plan to serve a potential residential subdivision on State Route 762 (Keaton Hill property) by reconfiguring nearby wastewater conveyance: they would redirect some flow through the industrial/warehouse district and free capacity to accept the new subdivision on a temporary basis, then tie to an eventual gravity sewer when it is constructed.

Why it matters: Utility capacity determines whether and how quickly a new subdivision can be built. Council members said the village must protect existing infrastructure and make sure the village does not assume long-term obligations for a temporary fix.

Presentation and village reaction: A consultant for the proposal (Bruce) explained that the site currently lacks a gravity sewer and that developers have identified using a Southern Point force main realignment as an interim measure. The consultant said the work would free capacity in constrained portions of the collection system and allow initial development steps. He said final engineering and phasing would depend on a later gravity trunk being extended through nearby property.

Council concerns and next steps: Council members repeatedly asked what benefit the village would receive, noting that the site is already annexed and that the property sits inside an existing Community Reinvestment Area (CRA) with tax-abatement terms in place. Council asked that any service commitment be tied to a development agreement that requires the developer to pay for tie‑ins, any necessary lift stations and to bond and complete a later gravity connection if required. Staff said they will draft a predevelopment agreement for council review if the developer wishes to proceed.

Ending: Council did not commit to construction but agreed staff should draft an agreement that lays out the village’s protections and the developer’s obligations before any final utility work proceeds.","A developer group described plans to use a temporary tie‑in to the Southern Point force main to serve a potential subdivision on State Route 762 and said it would later connect to a planned gravity line; council asked for a formal predevelopment agreement with protections for the village.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6083026,"Residents press council over Addison Farms density, roads and schools as developer seeks preliminary OK",6191,1057000,7248000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2935467-1f88c233803285b2011faf6b76155ecc&start=1057&end=7248","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2935467-1f88c233803285b2011faf6b76155ecc/thumbnail_1057000.jpg","/articles/6083026/Ohio/Residents-press-council-over-Addison-Farms-density-roads-and-schools-as-developer-seeks-preliminary-OK","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6083026-305bb5662c1bdf5abc100b8f7fa1396e/orig.mp4?Expires=1770495942&Signature=MRgNxTVNWQVcyNqI0Q3KFFhIpcLH8SqD~mvDhSmeD26tphZhRFXzSLOPCDVkAJ3RDEtsjtIvUXeEWPWY3EQL1SiaPGS6u-etzrqfdR2OkK6tGvJIu9zU3rxzHHblKQWLPDWIBPC1pC-CJJES4QyKBn3vcQLYvnqOHGQ6fTDZ1AXTQNkogeWjyEmX1XFKTRl7beRMrl4KXZtQ6Gift6D-bGmDBp4HwWIqSFkqvAqCgBbAB2Gc9wx-I0ZvdLuuCzIy8HXOCHOc1~i6uGQ1DNo6pTTbYAhlCjcY8GdEJMAtro4G~q~hOrj~c1n~e0VgQrR~UR4wva7W3m86YbNSsspGdg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Commercial Point Village Council heard more than a dozen residents press the council to reject or further limit the Addison Farms rezoning proposal, saying the plan would add traffic, strain schools and reduce neighborhood property values. Developer representatives from D.R. Horton presented a preliminary plan that includes townhome-style units the builder said would be priced below the existing average for new homes in the village.

The proposal has been before the village for months. Developer representatives said the project would provide a lower-cost housing option and substantial open space, while neighbors said infrastructure improvements must come first. “We did not sign up for our small country roads to be turned into busy city streets,” Patricia Anderson told council during public comment. “Voting no is the right choice.”

Why it matters: The council’s decision affects whether the property will be rezoned from “exceptional use” to a planned residential district, which would set density and development standards and allow the developer to proceed with detailed engineering and building permits. Neighbors repeatedly said existing two-lane and rural roads, school capacity and emergency services are already stressed.

Developer presentation and product: Molly Gwynne, a D.R. Horton representative, told the council the company plans a townhome product with units sized from roughly 1,521 to 1,654 square feet, two-car garages and pricing “starting at $375,000,” which she said is about $60,000 below other new homes in the immediate area. Jack Montino, identified as the division president on the presentation team, said the plan includes private streets maintained by a homeowners association, 43% open space, sidewalks and more than 2,000 feet of pedestrian paths.

Residents’ concerns: Dozens of residents urged the council to reject or tighten the plan. Several speakers cited traffic backups on State Route 104 and small local roads, capped school enrollments, and worries about water, stormwater runoff and police/fire capacity. “We have schools that don’t have room for our kids,” said Alex Eldreth. Others described flooding and loss of tree buffers after recent maintenance along creeks.

Council review and procedural outcome: Council discussed the packet and a staff review. Councilor Eric said he had recalculated the plan’s density and found the developer’s submission exceeded the council’s stated target of 4 units per net acre. Eric said his calculation produced 4.83 units per acre after subtracting roads and open space, and asked for a covenant or condition that the developer meet the 4-units-per-acre limit before final approval. The council voted to amend ordinance 2024-03 to incorporate the latest draft exhibits distributed in the meeting packet, but a motion to adopt the rezoning ordinance itself died for lack of a motion that night. No rezoning was approved.

Next steps: Developers said they will rework numbers and that the council can require a density cap or other conditions in any plan district text it adopts. Council members asked staff to confirm density calculations and enforcement language; developers asked for clear direction to finalize engineering. The matter remains before council and will return for future action if the developer submits revisions.

Ending: The council did not adopt the Addison Farms rezoning at this meeting; commissioners and residents said they plan more review before any final vote.","Commercial Point residents told council the Addison Farms proposal would overburden roads, schools and emergency services; developer representatives described a townhome product they say would expand attainable housing. Council amended the rezoning packet but did not adopt the ordinance at the meeting.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Council votes: variance denied, street closures approved, camera contract and annexation service resolution pass

Developers outline temporary sewer tie‑in for Keaton Hill parcel; council seeks protections

Residents press council over Addison Farms density, roads and schools as developer seeks preliminary OK