This article was created by AI using a key topic of the bill. It summarizes the key points discussed, but for full details and context, please refer to the full bill. Link to Bill

House Bill 130, introduced on April 9, 2025, by a bipartisan group of Montana legislators, aims to revise the state's fire policy, specifically regarding the responsibilities of fire protection entities. The bill seeks to enhance the state's ability to manage wildfire suppression costs by allowing state or local fire protection agencies to bill federal agencies for expenses incurred during fire suppression efforts.

The primary provisions of House Bill 130 include a clear declaration of the state's commitment to public safety and the protection of firefighters during wildfire suppression activities. It emphasizes the importance of minimizing property and resource loss due to wildfires and aims to reduce financial burdens on Montana taxpayers through proactive fire management strategies. The bill also encourages interagency cooperation among local, state, and federal entities, particularly in situations where restrictions on access to certain areas may be necessary.
final logo

Before you scroll further...

Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!

Subscribe for Free

Notably, the bill has sparked discussions among lawmakers regarding the implications of billing federal agencies for fire suppression costs. Supporters argue that this measure will ensure that the financial responsibilities of wildfire management are shared more equitably, while opponents express concerns about potential bureaucratic hurdles and the impact on federal-state relations.

The economic implications of House Bill 130 could be significant, particularly in light of Montana's increasing wildfire risks due to climate change. By facilitating a more efficient response to wildfires and potentially recouping costs from federal agencies, the bill aims to alleviate some of the financial strain on state resources.

Family Scribe
Custom Ad
As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its potential to reshape Montana's approach to wildfire management will be closely monitored. If passed, House Bill 130 could set a precedent for how states manage wildfire suppression costs and collaborate with federal agencies in the face of growing environmental challenges.

Converted from House Bill 130 bill
Link to Bill

Comments

    View Bill

    This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

    View Bill

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Montana articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI