This article was created by AI using a video recording of the meeting. It summarizes the key points discussed, but for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Link to Full Meeting

The court proceedings for the State vs. McIntyre continued on April 9, 2025, in the 187th District Court, presided over by Judge Stephanie Boyd. The session focused on the examination of evidence related to the case, particularly concerning fingerprint analysis.

The meeting began with the admission of evidence, specifically latent print cards identified by witness Jeremiah Rodriguez. The court allowed the introduction of these prints without objection. The witness was asked to present the prints to the jury, confirming their origin and the details of where they were collected, as previously explained by Raulo Hurtado, who lifted the prints.
final logo

Before you scroll further...

Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!

Subscribe for Free

The witness detailed that a total of 11 latent print cards were submitted, with 1 from Kimberly Wong and 10 from Raul Hurtado. However, it was noted that 7 of these cards did not yield any legible prints, limiting their evidentiary value. The witness confirmed that they could not testify regarding these non-identifiable prints.

Further discussions involved comparisons of the prints to known individuals, including Jeremiah Rodriguez, Jalen Bell, Mark Anthony Saldivar, Haymore McIntyre, and Joanna Reyes. The witness confirmed identifying legitimate prints from Jalen Bell and Jeremiah Rodriguez.

Family Scribe
Custom Ad
After concluding the examination of this witness, the court moved on to the next witness, Lindsey Patton, who is currently employed by the San Antonio Police Department. Patton, who has 17 years of experience, detailed her role in managing grants and budget items at the Southwest Texas Fusion Center. She also shared her background as a crime scene investigator, where she collected evidence and took fingerprints, confirming her employment in that capacity during the relevant time frame of June 6, 2017.

The session highlighted the meticulous process of evidence collection and analysis, underscoring the importance of forensic evidence in the ongoing trial. The court proceedings are set to continue as more witnesses are called to provide their testimonies.

Converted from WED., APRIL 9, 2025/JUDGE STEPHANIE BOYD/187TH DISTRICT COURT/MORN DOCK & JURY: STATE VS MCINTYRE meeting on April 09, 2025
Link to Full Meeting

Comments

    View full meeting

    This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

    View full meeting

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI