In a tense courtroom atmosphere on April 7, 2025, the trial of State vs. McIntyre unfolded under the watchful eye of Judge Stephanie Boyd at the 187th District Court in Texas. The proceedings took a pivotal turn as Joanna Reyes, a 27-year-old hairstylist from San Antonio, took the stand to provide crucial testimony regarding the case surrounding the death of Mark Anthony Salvador.
Reyes, who moved to San Antonio from Illinois at the age of ten, was questioned about her background and the circumstances leading to her involvement in the case. She confirmed that she had entered a plea agreement with the state, admitting to tampering with evidence related to Salvador's death. Originally charged with capital murder, Reyes negotiated a deal that significantly reduced her potential punishment, allowing her to plead to a lesser charge.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The courtroom was filled with tension as Reyes detailed her plea agreement, which included a recommendation for a deferred adjudication of ten years. This arrangement was contingent upon her cooperation and truthful testimony regarding the events surrounding Salvador's death. Reyes acknowledged that her plea was made in exchange for providing information to the state, a move that has raised questions about the integrity of the evidence presented.
As the prosecution presented State Exhibit Number 117, a document containing Reyes's plea agreement, the defense raised objections, leading to a brief but heated exchange in court. Judge Boyd ruled on the objections, allowing the exhibit to be admitted without further contest. This document is expected to play a significant role in the trial as it outlines the terms of Reyes's agreement and her responsibilities moving forward.
The courtroom proceedings highlighted the complexities of the legal system, particularly in cases involving serious charges like capital murder. Reyes's testimony not only sheds light on her personal journey but also underscores the broader implications of plea deals in the pursuit of justice. As the trial continues, the focus will remain on the evidence presented and the testimonies that will shape the outcome of this high-stakes case.