[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6082065,"mediaKeyId","2939411-9dfed02e7fa1141b7d74806b133d10cb","parentId",2939411,"title","Commissioners debate community power aggregation after delegation tables decision; no county enrollment action","audioSeconds",280,"startMs",5486000,"endMs",5766000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2939411-9dfed02e7fa1141b7d74806b133d10cb&start=5486&end=5766","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2939411-9dfed02e7fa1141b7d74806b133d10cb/thumbnail_5486000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6082065/Belknap-County/New-Hampshire/Commissioners-debate-community-power-aggregation-after-delegation-tables-decision-no-county-enrollment-action","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6082065-a721e436994b333e51c5ade3a7bc6384/orig.mp4?Expires=1770883879&Signature=mvXjVGXwlEqZ1SSuLwZEeJxueiw5Nocwb8l01l~G5m87BlMD1ZPK4Xs4NaqYa~71WJN73~vbBtz3iwh7z8q1Pou4pymagtmxj7aC1-~XN4QpaQNLnZvW1Syk0EBugdBImWdiM2XqEsHKtJ5TDN1AeYnI~rGqt4Y62lGQ6hSGdmVdCKMGVOOp05adb2ombLt31GlzCghLLrDeL0LkPKgtDGe2ahbFSYuNY8Tx4iqmoLKzKd64c6zMcbLPDJt~TCe2YUJpzTBsPU867~iVKPm7XIUvYkZ8QICrq9V3BHXhgHEnOD04i3dUV8gscWs1HpoFJXafOxAhXHVkrIJNMrmdWg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Belknap County NH","date","2025-04-10T04:47:21.273Z","article","Belknap County commissioners spent part of the meeting reviewing the county’s proposed community power aggregation program after the county delegation tabled a motion on the matter at its budget meeting.

Commissioners and coalition representatives said the delegation’s discussion reflected confusion about how a county aggregation would work. Commissioners emphasized the county program would allow residents to choose (opt in or opt out) and is intended to give residents another supplier option; it would not force residents into a higher price or remove choice.

County speakers and public commenters noted three technical points they said delegates misunderstood: 1) residents can opt out of an aggregation and keep the local utility; 2) aggregation rates are set for periods (the coalition’s rates reset every six months, some private suppliers set three‑year prices) and consumers can switch when meter read cycles permit; and 3) aggregation is intended to increase purchasing leverage and, in some nonprofit models, to reinvest savings into local clean‑energy projects.

Several speakers urged focused outreach to delegates before the delegation reconvenes. Eliza Lenbeder, who served as the county’s founding economic‑development director, and others said delegates had not read the coalition materials and recommended additional briefings. Tyler Carmichael of the planning office and other town representatives described municipal experiences: some towns elected to join nonprofit coalitions, others contracted with for‑profit suppliers; the town‑level experience was mixed and local officials recommended clarifying opt‑in mechanics for delegates and residents.

The board did not vote to join or reject any aggregation at the meeting. Commissioners said they will prioritize outreach and consider presenting additional information to the delegation, and one commissioner said the supplemental appropriation petition was the more urgent matter at present.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Belknap County Commissioners Meeting 4/8/25","oneSentenceSummary","Belknap County commissioners discussed a proposed community power aggregation and the delegation’s decision to table related action. Commissioners and public speakers said delegates had misunderstandings about opt‑in/opt‑out mechanics and called for better education before the delegation votes again.","taxTitle","Belknap County, New Hampshire","taxId",67496,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6082070,"Belknap County commissioners ask delegation for supplemental appropriation to restore UNH Extension, Conservation District and CASA",4633,1563000,6196000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2939411-9dfed02e7fa1141b7d74806b133d10cb&start=1563&end=6196","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2939411-9dfed02e7fa1141b7d74806b133d10cb/thumbnail_1563000.jpg","/articles/6082070/Belknap-County/New-Hampshire/Belknap-County-commissioners-ask-delegation-for-supplemental-appropriation-to-restore-UNH-Extension-Conservation-District-and-CASA","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6082070-5f84b43c56f82a372b2e2d0230bf9943/orig.mp4?Expires=1770883879&Signature=UqjPHuBGslFgS9qHEzsRV6R-79zGtJ81qtKRuT5CJolbcJIOVHfNCB-TxSziHlSToftDwwxiKmkBcX9HJfaP6afvc4ApTbsaOeLL63OcjMT9xq7E1NYJT6Wc3zZLRCL7PZy~qK9zMkUMROlZn9djUcoo7s6v3j2vrMieW50rysrlEHMgr-Eir5xMQ7O34p5IsOYpkgAnDUD0dya9fNaGW9gQao-0Nyl8oZN8W4WsI~I13tVUkEI4ZeSz9NZlqyMrCzbQUyJcYKqzG5NsYfWNm9mZrPpf~pA3pFvjel-sW6NDUXyQQcHQDFQCl4s3N8GA8C7Ja6l5AwgLo-kNMgvOLA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Belknap County commissioners voted to request a supplemental appropriation of roughly $130,000 from the county delegation to restore funding to the UNH Cooperative Extension, the Belknap County Conservation District and CASA, a move commissioners said is intended to protect grant revenue and local services that depend on those county allocations.

Commissioner Waring moved the request “in accordance with RSA 24:14‑a,” asking the delegation to reinstate the cuts; the motion was seconded and carried after the board’s voice vote. The board said it will present the delegation with a formal supplemental‑appropriation petition and support it at the required public hearing.

The request responds to cuts made by the county delegation at its budget meeting earlier this year that reduced the Cooperative Extension appropriation by roughly $100,000 and the Conservation District appropriation by about $25,000. Commissioners and agency representatives told the board those local cuts jeopardize larger streams of grant funding and programs that serve farmers, lakeshore communities, 4‑H participants and food distribution efforts.

Commissioner Waring and other commissioners summarized the financial impact they were told at the delegation hearing: for each dollar the county provides to Cooperative Extension, roughly $2 in state and federal grant funds and program revenue follows. Commissioners and several public speakers estimated aggregate lost grant funding and services could reach roughly $1.2 million if the cuts remain in place; the board described the net county request as about $124,000–$130,000 to make the agencies whole.

Speakers from the public told the board the cuts risked specific programs now under way. Patrick Wood and others urged commissioners to engage state senators and representatives on finance committees; Richard DeMar and Conservation District staff said current projects total about $202,000 for this year and that another roughly $240,000 in grant opportunities planned for next year would be jeopardized without staff time to write proposals. A Conservation District representative said the district’s farm equipment‑sharing, stream restoration contracts, invasive species removal and community‑garden coordination would be reduced or lost if staff support ends.

Public commenters connected those program cuts to local impacts: lake water quality monitoring and cyanobacteria response that affect tourism and public beaches, loss of free forestry and timber‑planning assistance for private landowners, reduced 4‑H participation at the county fair, and roughly 8,000 pounds of fresh produce distributed to local food banks this year that could be lost if extension services shrink.

County staff and commissioners discussed the legal process for a supplemental appropriation under RSA 24:14‑a, including notifying delegates and scheduling the mandated public hearing within 30 days of filing. Commissioners said the appropriation would increase the county’s total appropriation unless additional revenue to offset it is documented; staff estimated the change would raise the county tax bill by about $1.79 on a $250,000 house for the year if the appropriation is approved by the delegation.

The board asked staff to assemble documentation of lost grant revenue, program impacts and dollar‑value estimates to present to the delegation and to mobilize public attendance at the delegation hearing. Several speakers offered to assist with outreach to delegates and the senate finance committee.

Votes at a glance

- Motion to request a supplemental appropriation (restore funding to UNH Cooperative Extension, Belknap County Conservation District and CASA; requested amount stated by mover as approximately $130,000). Mover: Commissioner Waring. Second: not specified on the record. Outcome: approved (voice vote; recorded as \"All in favor. Aye. Aye.\" – motion carries).

- Approval of previous meeting minutes: motion carried (voice vote).

- Approval of calendar/previously signed documents: motion carried (voice vote).

The board said it will submit the supplemental‑appropriation petition to the delegation and follow the RSA 24:14‑a process, including public notice and a delegation hearing within the statutory period.","After public comment and commissioner debate, the Belknap County Board of Commissioners voted to ask the county delegation for a supplemental appropriation to restore funding cut from UNH Cooperative Extension, the Conservation District and CASA. Commissioners cited leveraged grant funding and local services that would be at risk if cuts remain.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Commissioners debate community power aggregation after delegation tables decision; no county enrollment action

Belknap County commissioners ask delegation for supplemental appropriation to restore UNH Extension, Conservation District and CASA