[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6081591,"mediaKeyId","2941816-6689a4e234fb92369a449bdfa4674d46","parentId",2941816,"title","Tuscaloosa preservation commission approves multiple exterior projects, denies one paint request","audioSeconds",3779,"startMs",332000,"endMs",4111000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2941816-6689a4e234fb92369a449bdfa4674d46&start=332&end=4111","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2941816-6689a4e234fb92369a449bdfa4674d46/thumbnail_332000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6081591/Tuscaloosa-City/Tuscaloosa-County/Alabama/Tuscaloosa-preservation-commission-approves-multiple-exterior-projects-denies-one-paint-request","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6081591-ad99e4a68beb550401d00995f7315e99/orig.mp4?Expires=1771204382&Signature=CSMz2S-HumKSk2Cuy-3hbdckzpX09maqk73SThDKVQcBov8s76d43vQkfLy0cvwWtj6zFOxTmQSgk4MoDk0vSSOzkfqGaXWCkSLF7L91RAB65~TPpBVbv6dOfQvJOPR~CHdfIg196BsXov0FYsRhDpKMolvgNuEPMXP7wFEDlVtiJKP3EHOJOq0BJqJgTYBwD0LEBhSM5Q7BAbNlAjENdJFhTuThEYI8wrfeSSw3oJe-8GHCV3fuzDflX4K6ClefDE-WVkWP3nU0wYG9wIACDYfEX7b6LF7yPp2ejmrfN0dSn9l2c9W1mSho0fyTKosZlTtcF2IhOTrllu0fdW7zTg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Tuscaloosa City, AL","date","2025-04-10T09:05:27.007Z","article","The Tuscaloosa Historic Preservation Commission on April 9 considered a slate of historic‑district applications and took action on multiple certificate of appropriateness requests, a withdrawal and procedural items.

The commission approved exterior alterations ranging from window replacements and signage to a front‑yard koi pond and a larger rehabilitation project, denied a request to paint most of a house foundation, and voted to allow one case to be withdrawn. The meeting also approved meeting synopses for February and March 2025 and the commission reported four expedited historic approvals since the previous meeting.

Why this matters: these routine COA actions determine what property owners in multiple local historic districts may do to building exteriors, porches and signage; approvals set conditions for later permitting and inspections while the denied application preserves existing unpainted masonry on a landmarked house.

Key decisions and details (Votes at a glance):
• Withdrawal — HPC‑17‑25: The commission voted to allow the applicant to withdraw the case after notice was received following mailings. Outcome: withdrawal approved (vote recorded as unanimous yes).

• Ken and Vicki Grodner — HPC‑21‑25 (27 The Downs, Downs Historic District; exterior alteration): The commission approved a request to remove the bottom half of a bathroom window (from 37 by 30.5 inches to 18.5 by 30.5 inches), add cedar shake where the lower sash is removed, and install wood shutters. Outcome: approved (unanimous yes).

• Robert D. Walker — HPC‑22‑25 (801 Queen City Avenue, Druid City Historic District; paint previously unpainted brick): The commission denied a request to paint three facades of mixed/patch brick to match existing painted brick columns; staff said the applicant implied the paint would be white but no color was formally specified in the application. Commissioners cited concerns about harmony and the permanence of painting brick when leaving the north (Eighth Street) side unpainted. Outcome: denied (vote recorded as majority no).

• Kim Roberts — HPC‑23‑25 (46 Sherwood Drive, Sherwood Drive Historic District; front‑yard path, stairs and koi pond): The commission approved installation of stamped red brick‑pattern concrete paths (3–8 feet wide), a wooden bridge to span tree roots, replacement of railroad‑tie gravel stairs with stamped concrete, a koi pond with a 15–18 foot irregular border, stone lining and flagstone surround, and accent lighting (string and uplighting). Outcome: approved (unanimous yes).

• E. C. Lambert Brown — HPC‑24‑25 (651 Twentieth Avenue, Druid City Historic District; sign, awning and door): The commission approved replacing existing steel double doors with fiberglass doors with windows, installing a 48 by 80‑inch canvas awning (20‑inch attachment tapering to 6 inches away from the facade) and a 72 by 28‑inch polymetal sign. Outcome: approved (unanimous yes).

• Ed and Lisa Delinski — HPC‑25‑25 (1100 Myrtlewood Drive, Myrtlewood Historic District; material change to windows): The commission approved replacement of 10 deteriorated wood window sashes with aluminum‑clad wood sashes (no change in light pattern or size; trims and frames to remain wood); one attic window will receive a new screen. Outcome: approved (unanimous yes).

• J. Boatwright Specialty Group — HPC‑26‑25 (1316 Riverside Drive, Capelwood Historic District; windows, exterior alterations and porch replacement): The commission approved a multi‑part rehabilitation including stucco repair, replacement of siding with Hardie board, painting, removal of window units and installation of consistent composite windows (many changing to a 4‑over‑4 light pattern based on original windows), replacement and lowering of a front porch (4‑inch adjustment to correct drainage), replacement of doors, and assorted site and electrical cleanup. Outcome: approved (unanimous yes).

Procedural actions: The commission dispensed with reading the synopses for February and March 2025 and approved the synopses; the chair asked commissioners about conflicts of interest (none reported) and staff confirmed proper public notice had been provided.

Other business: staff reported four historic expedited approvals since the previous meeting; no additional detail was provided on those cases during the hearing.

Recorded motions and tallies are listed below. Applicants were reminded that final inspections by city staff are required to confirm compliance with approved certificates and that any changes must be coordinated with planning staff before construction.

","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Tuscaloosa Historic Preservation Commission Meeting - Apr 09, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","On April 9 the Tuscaloosa Historic Preservation Commission acted on seven certificates of appropriateness and a withdrawal request: it approved exterior alterations, signs, windows replacements, a front‑yard koi pond and a major renovation, denied a partial foundation‑painting request, and allowed one case to be withdrawn.","taxTitle","Tuscaloosa City, Tuscaloosa County, Alabama","taxId",4830,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6081597,"Historic preservation panel approves demolition and mixed‑use replacement at 505 Nineteenth Avenue",1336,368000,1704000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2941816-6689a4e234fb92369a449bdfa4674d46&start=368&end=1704","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2941816-6689a4e234fb92369a449bdfa4674d46/thumbnail_368000.jpg","/articles/6081597/Tuscaloosa-City/Tuscaloosa-County/Alabama/Historic-preservation-panel-approves-demolition-and-mixeduse-replacement-at-505-Nineteenth-Avenue","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6081597-4ceb27407e25a178e47dadee2b07cc18/orig.mp4?Expires=1771204382&Signature=OVHveQmgy~fziuEa3JJAS5aryZ2Fhh8nYtiqOKCRersi5wgaGZFK946rugcx7Gr1XVEvVsa3RJtLmYKBXC4MVE-BSjV79uBpXIGxhXVaIET~j0~M6BS0Mv2Q8o5e3Tvm4MLrparvfeDBnRlHd1-y9rIRHiRA9zmAnNCjIljj6NQ~CJPVn1Eca9S80evY4i2g1FfkGbpScR5RP-hv-Bxgiz39WMiMUIFYsyN-CRmkvM6~HyxzwFhz-Vrd0Mi1feGNk6pEJb5CgXKnWNgnsRn2i-ojvrCuKep8TxWgLh6xY4ytzzcXW7akdX0UQU-K334b6GeoFPPPCPVk2l3njnR90Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Tuscaloosa Historic Preservation Commission on April 9 approved a certificate of appropriateness to demolish the existing structure at 505 Nineteenth Avenue and build a new mixed‑use building in the Druid City Historic District.

Commission members approved the application after the applicant reduced the rooftop massing and removed an occupied roof deck that had required an elevator overrun; the commission voted unanimously to approve the project.

The application matters because the site sits on a transitional block near downtown where commissioners said additional density is occurring, and the commission evaluates projects for compatibility with design guidelines that govern materials, scale and form in historic districts.

City staff introduced the case and said the applicant previously appeared before the commission in December. Brandon Bell, an architect with Gresham Smith, told the commission the design team removed the occupied rooftop deck to avoid the elevator overrun and re‑shaped the rooftop stair enclosure, reducing the building height by 5 feet 11 inches. “We removed that occupied roof, so that eliminated, the majority of the elevator overrun,” Bell said. He told commissioners the stair still provides roof access for maintenance and that HVAC units would be accessed through that opening.

Bell described the proposed materials as predominantly masonry with aluminum‑clad composite metal framing (an ACM product) around balcony and canopy elements and a synthetic wood product for some trim. He said the project uses cast‑in‑place concrete construction to achieve floor‑to‑floor heights suitable to the developer’s apartment program and to provide “a 10 foot clear ceiling in, in many of the spaces.”

Commission discussion focused most on height and materials. “I have a little concern with the height,” said Kathy Pagani, chair of the Tuscaloosa Historic Preservation Commission. Commissioner Jordan Morris said he welcomed additional density at the site and that the block has felt “underdeveloped.” Commissioners also noted design changes that reduced the visual mass of the rooftop appendage and that the proposed materials attempt to reference the neighborhood’s masonry character without reusing the existing brick.

Motion and vote: The commission moved to approve the certificate of appropriateness for AJ Toisiale/Toisiale Properties LLC to demolish the existing structure and construct the proposed mixed‑use building at 505 Nineteenth Avenue (DHPC‑125). The recorded vote was Ms. Mary Harmon Young — yes; Mr. Deason — yes; Mr. Jordan Morris — yes; Dr. Wayne Yarbrough — yes; Dr. Sally Davis — yes; Kathy Pagani, chair — yes. Outcome: approved (6 yes, 0 no).

The commission noted there will be a final inspection by city staff to confirm construction complies with the certificate as approved and reminded the applicant to contact staff if plans change before construction begins. The staff presentation referenced the commission’s design guidelines and demolition standards in the Code of Tuscaloosa as the basis for review.

Proposed next steps for the project — building permitting, final staff inspection and construction sequencing — were not specified in detail at the hearing.

","The Tuscaloosa Historic Preservation Commission on April 9 approved a certificate of appropriateness to demolish an existing building at 505 Nineteenth Avenue and construct a new mixed‑use building after the applicant reduced rooftop height and removed an occupied roof deck.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Tuscaloosa preservation commission approves multiple exterior projects, denies one paint request

Historic preservation panel approves demolition and mixed‑use replacement at 505 Nineteenth Avenue