Community voices concern over Crown Castle's cell tower plans in Carmel California

April 10, 2025 | San Mateo City, San Mateo County, California

Thanks to Scribe from Workplace AI and Family Portal , all articles about California are free for you to enjoy throughout 2025!


This article was created by AI using a video recording of the meeting. It summarizes the key points discussed, but for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Link to Full Meeting

During the recent Sustainability & Infrastructure Commission meeting held on April 9, 2025, in San Mateo, significant concerns were raised regarding the proposed installation of wireless facilities by Crown Castle. Residents expressed frustration over the perceived lack of transparency and justification for the project, which they believe prioritizes corporate interests over community health and safety.

One resident highlighted the potential risks associated with the installation of 5G technology, particularly in residential areas. They referenced statements from former AT&T CFO Bob Cavanagh, who criticized the motives behind the telecom company's push for approval, suggesting it was driven by a desire to compete in the broadband market rather than a genuine need for improved service. The resident emphasized the importance of protecting vulnerable populations, including children at local daycare facilities, from potential radiation exposure.
final logo

Before you scroll further...

Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!

Subscribe for Free

Concerns were also raised about the technical justifications provided by Crown Castle. The resident pointed out inconsistencies in the company's claims regarding the necessary spacing for wireless facilities, arguing that alternative sites further away from homes were being dismissed without adequate explanation. They called for a more thorough examination of the proposed locations and the technical objectives of the installations, asserting that the information provided by Crown Castle lacked specificity and did not allow for meaningful community discussion.

The meeting underscored the ongoing tension between technological advancement and community health, as residents urged the commission to prioritize public safety and uphold design standards. As the commission continues to deliberate on these issues, the community remains watchful, advocating for transparency and accountability in decisions that directly impact their lives.

Converted from Sustainability & Infrastructure Commission Meeting 4.9.25 meeting on April 10, 2025
Link to Full Meeting

Comments

    View full meeting

    This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

    View full meeting

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Family Portal
    Family Portal