The Alabama Senate Education Policy Committee convened on April 9, 2025, to discuss Senate Bill 278, a proposed measure aimed at allowing students to attend religious classes during school hours. This initiative, which is entirely optional and requires parental consent, seeks to address the growing demand from parents for religious education options in public schools.
Senator John Nutt, a proponent of the bill, emphasized that the legislation would empower local school boards to create tailored policies for their districts. Currently, only 12 out of Alabama's school districts have adopted such policies since a 2019 law permitted them. Nutt highlighted that over 4,500 parents have signed a petition advocating for a religious release program, indicating significant community interest. He reassured committee members that the bill would not impose financial burdens on schools, as participating faith-based organizations would assume liability and provide transportation for students attending off-site classes.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Supporters of the bill, including Sunny Cotton from Lifewise Academy, argued that the program has successfully operated in nearly 600 schools nationwide, reflecting a strong desire among parents for Bible education integrated into their children's school week. Cotton noted that many local communities have expressed interest in establishing similar programs but have faced obstacles from school administrations.
However, the bill faced opposition from several committee members and public speakers. Critics, including Ben Baker, a long-serving superintendent, voiced concerns that the legislation undermines local control by mandating policies that may not align with community needs. Baker argued that existing laws already allow local boards to make decisions regarding educational content, and he cautioned against the vague definition of "religious instruction," which could lead to unintended consequences.
Other opponents, like Ryan Hollingsworth, raised practical concerns about the impact on instructional time, emphasizing the challenges schools already face in meeting educational requirements. They argued that releasing students for religious instruction could exacerbate issues like chronic absenteeism and hinder academic progress.
As the committee heard from both proponents and opponents, it became clear that the debate over Senate Bill 278 reflects broader tensions regarding educational choice, parental rights, and the role of religion in public education. The committee is expected to continue discussions and consider the implications of the bill for Alabama's school districts and families.