During a recent meeting of the Nevada Legislature's Subcommittee on Education Accountability, significant concerns were raised regarding the accuracy and reliability of graduation scores generated by the Infinite Campus model. A key discussion point highlighted the unexpected trend in graduation likelihood among students, particularly noting that seventh and eighth graders appeared more likely to graduate than their older peers.
One member of the subcommittee shared insights from their district, which serves approximately 7,200 students. They noted that while the graduation scores ranged from a low of 50 to a high of 150, it was surprising to find that the students most likely to graduate were not the twelfth graders, who typically are expected to excel academically and maintain perfect attendance. Instead, the data suggested that younger students were performing better in terms of graduation likelihood, raising questions about the underlying factors contributing to this anomaly.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The member expressed confusion over these findings, indicating that while the data seemed to have normalized in the current year, inconsistencies in data entry and reporting may have influenced the results. This situation underscores the need for a closer examination of how graduation scores are calculated and the potential implications for educational strategies moving forward.
In addition to this primary discussion, the subcommittee acknowledged the importance of continued funding for educational initiatives, thanking the legislature for past support. As the committee moves forward, addressing these discrepancies in graduation data will be crucial for ensuring that all students receive the support they need to succeed in their educational journeys.