[{"_1":2,"_88":-5,"_89":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6608399,"mediaKeyId","2939509-f64271bc74cf9d4278ec632686935f76","parentId",2939509,"title","Mapleton council adopts midyear amendment to fiscal 2024–25 budget; small capital and operational adjustments included","audioSeconds",463,"startMs",4067000,"endMs",4530000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2939509-f64271bc74cf9d4278ec632686935f76&start=4067&end=4530","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2939509-f64271bc74cf9d4278ec632686935f76/thumbnail_4067000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6608399/Utah/Mapleton-council-adopts-midyear-amendment-to-fiscal-202425-budget-small-capital-and-operational-adjustments-included","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6608399-3ec027309eaabe25aeb3e0cedeba97f7/orig.mp4?Expires=1770493618&Signature=M1S-nkOo4GYyDltSprO~MSHC9Oe9g-62YNH-l2AzA1Nsy2~FyfEg9drReuZpXChS0E3GaWV5jT6ai8W3vgQ31KVJqZax2iF0TEg1qi4q-VjW1Fuh6hvZ3qGJa7sh1yGLHf949SAL3dToTKYz-2Yb9TUzioyYfX0Ey43RFnWGFkIJTUM1aasYz2KnYevF457edP1I-viOw0Af5wwjOpABB5QecAY2PaO7Ngb1a9sSJ3i~bYUS~95o9BT7jTqFqARR7c~QELZo9UKs9dvEuru9fNPY4QxDg4pkuPGUeK2UM2~ozxARmI0q8lUSxUvzeEWecbnQt6DJNknrQeC-D8waGQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Mapleton","date","2025-04-10T02:09:46.27Z","article","The Mapleton City Council adopted a resolution amending the current fiscal year 2024–25 city budget, approving a set of adjustments to operating and capital funds presented by staff.

Finance and staff presenters outlined the primary changes in the general fund and enterprise funds. After the proposed amendments, staff said the projected general fund surplus would decline to about $226,816. Staff described a series of items underpinning that change, including previously committed developer-funded streetlight installations paid out in the current fiscal year, and the creation of a new RAP (recreation, arts and parks) special revenue fund with an estimated $25,000 in sales-tax revenue to be collected between April and June. No RAP fund expenditures were proposed at this time; staff said anticipated RAP spending would appear in the FY 2026 budget cycle.

Capital adjustments recorded on the amendment included recording a police vehicle previously approved by council, the planned sale and replacement of parks mowing equipment (two new zero-turn mowers replacing an older specialized mower), and adding a $15,000 small project to connect North Park to a culinary-to-pressurized irrigation (PI) connection. Staff also reported a timing change for the public works facility project, pushing roughly $500,000 of work into the next fiscal year for design and early-stage activities. Enterprise fund items noted included a reduced water transfer to the PI fund (because more users are connected) and an increased sewer payment to Spanish Fork tied to recent development at Harmony Ridge.

During the hearing council members asked clarifying questions about the RAP fund timing, the $25,000 revenue estimate, the North Park connector project and equipment specifics for the parks department. Staff said the $25,000 figure is an estimate for the April–June collection period and that staff would return with future expenditure proposals. Councilmembers asked that the record reflect the source of some charges (developer commitments for streetlights) and confirmed that larger capital projects would be scheduled in the FY 2026 budget cycle.

Councilmember Beck moved to adopt the resolution amending the FY 2024–25 budget; Councilmember Eckberg seconded. The motion carried and the transcript records the motion as adopted; the published record does not show a full roll-call tally for every council member in the transcript excerpt.

Staff said the administration historically brings two budget amendments each year but has split amendments into smaller updates this year to track changes more frequently. The council’s adoption authorizes staff to reallocate the budget lines described and to present any subsequent RAP expenditures and larger capital allocations in future budget processes.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","City Council Meeting - 4/09/25","oneSentenceSummary","The council adopted a resolution amending the current fiscal year 2024–25 budget, recording modest adjustments to the general fund surplus, establishing a RAP tax fund line, and adding capital items including streetlight installs, a police vehicle entry on the budget, parks equipment changes and a $15,000 connector project for North Park.","taxTitle","Mapleton City Council, Mapleton, Utah County, Utah","taxId",20088,"location","Utah","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6608404,"Mapleton council approves rezoning of parcels behind Main Street but denies rezone inside Maple Farm Estates subdivision",2950,980000,3930000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2939509-f64271bc74cf9d4278ec632686935f76&start=980&end=3930","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2939509-f64271bc74cf9d4278ec632686935f76/thumbnail_980000.jpg","/articles/6608404/Utah/Mapleton-council-approves-rezoning-of-parcels-behind-Main-Street-but-denies-rezone-inside-Maple-Farm-Estates-subdivision","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6608404-15a98bf05e1fc88ba182016d2f9fcfbc/orig.mp4?Expires=1770493618&Signature=OZQ24kNiM9fy8oVMw1ZM0cNviM8rgY0xKMKnjolAuwpPnD2kfGXydxpqTO5JSQuYRrtnLJbbp2F0Ni130sRal-K1zSub1zBfyaPXPuKCoqmLFOewj2ih0HnCubiKRd2xLUop3Mamq~yId0IlK8X9aEgDMy4n-NyejG7PRwRANFh7SNSestBm4nSKOvxrE8eJHRxjPnkFbZZsavb9Qtrzg5f5TYTFxeii4O6fY~GpGDvc5Z-ltodmaxWdYdN-J4Q-L2j7q1jFPWvlzK6rizlppGhZF9zTFBndEINGpHeA1AdMNjID0rjJvw-7SgqL94WWN0zxMPlVwtKlntvUA9tJ6w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Mapleton City Council voted to approve a rezone for two parcels behind a Main Street lot from A-2 (rural residential) to RA-1 (one-acre residential) and denied a separate request to rezone Lot 7 inside the Maple Farm Estates subdivision.

The decision followed a public hearing in which city staff described the application, neighbors and experts offered competing views on neighborhood character and property values, and council members debated consistency with the Mapleton general plan and subdivision integrity.

City planning staff explained the request and displayed the zoning and future land use maps, saying the general plan’s low-density residential designation corresponds to RA-1 and noting the applicant filed a concept plan showing a potential new road and two one-acre lots along the north boundary. Staff identified some inconsistency in the application materials about the acreage behind Main Street (both 2.3 and 2.7 acres are cited in the record) and clarified that the applicant is not requesting a rezone of Lot 8, which already contains a home. The planning commission recommended approval of rezoning the parcels behind Main Street but recommended denial of rezoning Lot 7 within Maple Farm Estates because of concerns about changing the existing subdivision.

Several residents who said they own property in Maple Farm Estates testified against rezoning Lot 7, saying they bought into a large-lot, rural subdivision in 1979 and expect its character to remain. Tom James, who lives across the street from Lot 7, said he moved to Mapleton for the “wide open spaces” and that converting one two-acre lot within a long-established subdivision would change its character. Dee Dee Dart described problems that can arise when smaller lots are created next to long-time agricultural uses, saying subsequent neighbors sometimes complain about odors, animals and nighttime irrigation.

Other speakers supported the applicant. Mark Wilkinson, a real estate broker who identified himself as a former planning commissioner and expert witness, said smaller lots and new high-end homes commonly increase surrounding property values and that many buyers prefer one-acre or smaller lots due to maintenance concerns. The applicant’s engineer, Stephen Lord, said subdivision boundaries are not definitive indicators of neighborhood character and argued that nearby parcels already zoned RA-1 should be considered part of the broader neighborhood context.

Council discussion emphasized two competing principles: property owners’ rights to use and subdivide land consistent with the general plan and the council’s interest in preserving the integrity and character of an existing subdivision. Several council members said they were sympathetic to the applicant’s request but concerned about establishing a “spot zoning” precedent that would allow piecemeal changes within long-standing subdivisions. Councilmember comments repeatedly referenced the council’s land-use guiding principles to preserve Mapleton’s rural atmosphere, favor larger family residential lots, and ensure compatibility of land uses.

Councilmember Garrett moved to approve the rezone for the two parcels behind Main Street and deny the rezone request for Lot 7 within Maple Farm Estates; Councilmember Beck seconded. The motion passed; the record shows the council approved the rezoning of the parcels behind Main Street and denied the rezoning of Lot 7. The transcript records the motion as passing \"by all council members,\" but exact roll-call counts were not specified in the printed record.

The applicants told the council they are not seeking subdivision approval now and said they intend for the change to permit two one-acre homes for their adult children in the future. Opponents asked the council to preserve the subdivision boundary, warning that allowing one lot to be reduced could encourage future splits. The council did not direct staff to prepare a subdivision approval at this meeting.

Next steps described by staff include reflecting the council’s decision in the zoning map and returning any related subdivision or site-specific proposals to the city for separate review and application processes.

Votes at a glance: the council approved the rezoning of the parcels behind Main Street from A-2 to RA-1 and denied the requested rezoning of Lot 7 in Maple Farm Estates. The motion to approve the two parcels and deny Lot 7 was moved by Councilmember Garrett and seconded by Councilmember Beck and recorded in the transcript as passing; exact numeric roll-call totals were not specified in the meeting record.","After public hearings and hours of comments from neighbors and experts, the Mapleton City Council approved rezoning two parcels behind Main Street from A-2 to RA-1 while denying a request to rezone Lot 7 inside the Maple Farm Estates subdivision.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Mapleton council adopts midyear amendment to fiscal 2024–25 budget; small capital and operational adjustments included

Mapleton council approves rezoning of parcels behind Main Street but denies rezone inside Maple Farm Estates subdivision