The New Hampshire Legislature convened on April 10, 2025, to address several key issues during the House Session. The meeting began with a parliamentary inquiry from Representative Dan McGuire, who raised concerns about the costs associated with cases at the PTLA compared to those in superior court. He highlighted that PTLA cases cost taxpayers approximately $20,000 each, while superior court cases are significantly cheaper at $1,500. McGuire suggested that the addition of two new judges to the superior court could provide a more cost-effective solution.
Following this discussion, the House proceeded to a roll call vote on amendment 1569. The motion was passed with 83 votes against and 80 in favor, indicating a close decision on the matter.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Representative Damon then introduced floor amendment 1561, which aims to allow New Hampshire to participate in a USDA pilot project. This initiative would facilitate the enrollment of students already on Medicaid into the free and reduced school meals program. Damon emphasized that this is an opt-in program, ensuring families can choose whether to enroll their children without compromising their privacy. He reassured members that the amendment would not affect adequacy aid payments during the pilot period and that it would automatically repeal after two years, allowing future legislatures to evaluate its effectiveness.
Damon underscored the importance of providing access to school meals, linking it to improved educational outcomes and health benefits for children. He noted that many families face barriers in completing applications for meal assistance, which can lead to food insecurity among students. The amendment aims to alleviate this issue, potentially benefiting up to 10,500 children across New Hampshire.
The session concluded with a call for support for the amendment, highlighting the economic and social benefits of ensuring that food-insecure children receive the meals they need to thrive. The discussions reflected a commitment to addressing both fiscal responsibility and the welfare of vulnerable populations in the state.