Scranton zoning board reviews appeal against illegal Airbnb at 1405 Cherry Street

In a recent meeting of the Scranton Zoning Hearing Board, significant discussions centered around the appeal of a violation letter regarding an alleged illegal Airbnb at 1405 Cherry Street. The case, presented by homeowner Kevin Noon, raised critical questions about zoning regulations and community impact in the R-six zone, which is known for its strict restrictions on single-family homes.

The meeting began with the board approving a separate application unanimously, demonstrating a collaborative spirit among members. However, the focus quickly shifted to Noon’s appeal, which stemmed from a complaint by a neighbor. The city’s zoning department had issued a violation letter, asserting that Noon was not meeting the requirement of residing in the property for at least six months of the year, a stipulation for operating a short-term rental.

Noon defended his position, stating that he has lived in the home for over 20 years and that it serves as his primary residence. He emphasized his commitment to maintaining the property and engaging with neighbors to address any concerns. Noon explained that he rents the property primarily on weekends to help cover his mortgage, which he does not view as a business venture but rather as a means of financial assistance.

Board members raised concerns about the implications of allowing short-term rentals in a residential area. One member highlighted that the R-six zone is the most restricted in Scranton, suggesting that permitting an Airbnb could set a precedent for similar businesses in the neighborhood. This perspective was echoed by local residents, including Edward Gilmartin, who presented a petition signed by 69 neighbors opposing the Airbnb, citing concerns about noise, parking, and the overall character of the community.

Additional testimonies from residents indicated skepticism about Noon’s claims of residency, with some asserting they had never seen him at the property. Parking issues were also a significant concern, as the lack of sidewalks and limited street space complicate pedestrian safety and accessibility.

The board's deliberation on this matter reflects broader tensions in Scranton regarding the balance between property rights and community integrity. As the city grapples with increasing demands for housing and the rise of short-term rentals, the outcome of this appeal could have lasting implications for zoning practices and neighborhood dynamics.

The hearing concluded without a definitive resolution, leaving the board to consider the testimonies and evidence presented. The decision on Noon’s appeal will be pivotal in shaping the future of short-term rentals in Scranton, as the community awaits clarity on how such properties will be regulated moving forward.