Alderman Long advocates for two-year election cycles and partisan elections in Manchester

In a recent meeting of the Board of Mayor and Aldermen in Manchester, New Hampshire, discussions centered on the implications of the city's election cycle and governance structure. The meeting highlighted the importance of maintaining two-year election terms, as expressed by several board members, who argued that shorter terms foster closer connections between elected officials and their constituents.

One member emphasized that the nature of voting behavior shifts significantly during election years, suggesting that decisions made in these periods may not always align with the best interests of the city. This observation raises concerns about accountability and the potential for elected officials to prioritize re-election over effective governance. The member pointed out that historical voting patterns, particularly regarding tax cap overrides, tend to favor off-year elections, indicating a reluctance to make contentious decisions close to election dates.

The discussion also touched on the potential for changing the electoral system to restore partisan elections. Advocates for this change argue that nonpartisan elections have inadvertently strengthened incumbency, making it difficult for new candidates to challenge established officeholders. The member presented data showing that very few incumbents have been defeated since the shift to nonpartisan elections, suggesting that voters may benefit from knowing candidates' party affiliations to make more informed choices.

Additionally, there was a proposal to consider whether the Manchester school district should be restructured as a department of the city, which would allow for greater oversight of the school budget by the mayor and the board. This change could enhance accountability and streamline governance, reflecting a desire for more integrated management of city resources.

The meeting concluded with a call for further exploration of these topics, including the possibility of putting these issues to a public vote. As Manchester navigates these discussions, the outcomes could significantly impact the city's political landscape and governance practices in the years to come.