New Hampshire committee explores weapons possession laws including brass knuckles and blackjack

In a lively session at the New Hampshire Senate Judiciary Committee meeting on April 10, 2025, lawmakers engaged in a spirited debate over the legality and regulation of certain self-defense weapons, including brass knuckles, blackjacks, and slung shots. The discussion highlighted the complexities of existing laws and the perceived inconsistencies in their enforcement.

As the meeting unfolded, one representative passionately argued for a reevaluation of the current ban on these items, suggesting that the law is outdated and overly complicated. He pointed out that while it is legal to carry firearms, tasers, and even more dangerous items, the restrictions on brass knuckles and similar weapons seem arbitrary. “If I have a hunting and fishing license, I can carry brass knuckles, but if another representative doesn’t, they can’t,” he noted, emphasizing the confusing nature of the law.

The representative further explained that many of these items, often viewed as antiques or collectibles, are still available for purchase online, raising questions about the effectiveness of the ban. He illustrated his point with anecdotes about the historical use of blackjacks by fishermen and the common sale of slung shots as keychain accessories, which are technically illegal yet widely available.

Senator Osterholm joined the conversation, acknowledging the existence of modern versions of these weapons sold online, which complicates the narrative around their prohibition. The representative responded by highlighting the lack of enforcement and the minimal impact these items have on public safety, arguing that the focus should be on more pressing issues like knife violence or firearm misuse.

The dialogue also touched on the broader implications of self-defense laws, particularly in light of rising concerns about personal safety in various communities. Jeff Kelman, a member of the Jewish community and a security committee member at his local temple, expressed the need for thoughtful legislation that considers the safety of minority groups in the face of increasing antisemitism and potential violence.

As the meeting concluded, the representatives left with a sense of urgency to address these outdated laws, recognizing that the conversation around self-defense weapons is not just about legality but also about community safety and the evolving landscape of personal protection. The committee's discussions signal a potential shift in New Hampshire's approach to self-defense legislation, aiming to align it more closely with contemporary realities and public sentiment.