In the dimly lit chambers of Tiverton Town Hall, council members gathered on April 10, 2025, to address pressing issues surrounding the local water supply and the contentious relationship between the North Tiverton Water District and Stonebridge Water Company. The atmosphere was charged with a mix of urgency and frustration as discussions unfolded about the future of water services for the community.
At the heart of the meeting was a critical examination of the existing contract between North Tiverton and Stonebridge, which many council members deemed unfair. Concerns were raised about the financial implications for taxpayers, particularly as the cost of water from Stonebridge was reportedly higher than what North Tiverton could provide. Councilor Dave Camitto emphasized the need for both entities to collaborate, suggesting that a merger or at least a reevaluation of their boundaries could lead to better service and lower costs for residents.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The dialogue revealed a shared sentiment among council members that the current situation was untenable. Camitto pointed out that both districts needed to set aside their differences and work together to ensure reliable fire protection and fresh water for Tiverton. He advocated for an engineering study to provide concrete data, which could guide future decisions and eliminate any ambiguity in the ongoing negotiations.
Councilor Paul echoed these sentiments, highlighting the professionalism of the North Tiverton staff while acknowledging the need for a more unified approach to water management. He noted that the ongoing discussions were a step in the right direction, even if they stemmed from previous resolutions that had sparked controversy.
As the meeting progressed, the complexities of the situation became apparent. Council members debated the merits of sending proposals to the state legislature, with some arguing that local governance should take precedence. The tension between the two water districts was palpable, with accusations of misinformation and mismanagement surfacing throughout the discussions.
Ultimately, the council recognized that the future of Tiverton's water supply hinged on cooperation and transparency. The meeting concluded with a commitment to continue dialogue, emphasizing that the well-being of the community should remain the primary focus. As the council members left the chamber, the path forward remained uncertain, but the urgency for a resolution was clear. The residents of Tiverton would be watching closely as their leaders navigated these turbulent waters.