Cass County plans expansion of treatment center with new 72-bed facility

In a recent meeting of the North Dakota House Appropriations Human Resources Division, lawmakers gathered to discuss critical developments in the state's correctional facilities and budget allocations. The atmosphere was charged with anticipation as representatives examined the implications of expanding bed capacity in the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (DOCR).

One of the key topics was the addition of guaranteed beds, which is expected to significantly enhance the state's capacity to manage its inmate population. A representative highlighted that increasing the number of available beds from 72 to 112 would alleviate the need for prioritization in inmate placement, a concern that has weighed heavily on local communities like Cass County. This strategic move aims to ensure that the DOCR can better accommodate the growing demands of the correctional system.

The discussion also touched on the impact of new felony laws and increased sentencing guidelines, which could further complicate the formula used to determine inmate capacity. As lawmakers considered these changes, they acknowledged the need for a more dynamic approach to projections, with plans to collaborate with the North Dakota Information Technology (NDIT) to develop updated formulas that reflect the evolving landscape of corrections.

In addition to capacity discussions, the committee reviewed budget allocations for the purchase of a man camp, with a proposed budget of $8 million. This figure, while lower than the executive budget's $9.3 million, is intended to cover the acquisition of the facility itself, along with some initial operational costs. The conversation revealed adjustments in the number of rooms from 88 to 72, a change that was deemed acceptable given the facility's improved condition.

As the meeting concluded, representatives expressed optimism about the future of North Dakota's correctional facilities. With strategic expansions and budget considerations underway, the state is poised to enhance its capacity to manage its correctional population effectively, ensuring that both safety and rehabilitation remain at the forefront of its efforts. The implications of these discussions will undoubtedly resonate throughout the community as lawmakers continue to navigate the complexities of the correctional system.