Arizona lawmakers debate SB 11 64 immigration bill amid fears of racial profiling

The Arizona Legislature's recent House Floor Session on April 10, 2025, saw heated debates surrounding Senate Bill 1164, which aims to enhance local law enforcement's role in immigration enforcement. The discussions highlighted deep divisions among lawmakers regarding the implications of the bill on communities, public safety, and the economy.

Opponents of SB 1164 voiced strong concerns about the potential for racial profiling and the creation of a climate of fear among immigrant communities. Representative Sandoval emphasized the human cost of such policies, recalling tragic incidents linked to bullying and discrimination against immigrants. He argued that the bill perpetuates a narrative of invasion that harms not only immigrants but also U.S. citizens and communities of color across Arizona. "Hate has no home in Arizona," he stated, urging colleagues to vote against the legislation.

Representative Villegas echoed these sentiments, describing the bill as a revival of harmful past policies that encourage racial profiling and distract law enforcement from their primary duties. He criticized the lack of funding for the proposed measures, warning that it would lead to increased costs for taxpayers and further strain already overburdened public services.

In contrast, supporters of the bill, like Representative Martinez, framed illegal immigration as a serious crime that undermines the rule of law. He argued for stricter enforcement to protect communities from individuals who pose a threat. Martinez's comments sparked further debate about the balance between legal immigration and public safety, with some representatives asserting that the bill fails to address the complexities of immigration reform.

The session also featured personal testimonies from lawmakers, with several sharing their own family histories as immigrants. Representative Gutierrez highlighted the contributions of immigrants to Arizona's economy, noting that they play vital roles in various sectors. He criticized the bill for fostering hate and discrimination, calling for a more humane approach to immigration policy.

As the session concluded, the overwhelming sentiment among opponents was clear: SB 1164 is seen as a step backward for Arizona, risking the well-being of families and communities. Lawmakers emphasized the need for comprehensive immigration reform that addresses the root causes of immigration issues rather than punitive measures that divide and marginalize.

The outcome of this contentious debate will have lasting implications for Arizona's immigrant communities and the broader societal landscape, as lawmakers continue to grapple with the complexities of immigration policy in a rapidly changing world.