Judge Cresswell examines Sitla's land ownership and conditional use process

The San Juan County Planning Commission meeting on April 10, 2025, was dominated by discussions surrounding land use regulations and the implications of state law on local ordinances. A key focus was the role of the School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA) in the approval process for conditional land use applications.

Commission members debated whether SITLA, as the property owner, is bound by county ordinances when seeking conditional use permits. The conversation highlighted concerns about the potential for SITLA to bypass local regulations, as state law indicates that they are not obligated to adhere to county rules. This raised questions about the integrity of the approval process and the authority of local governance.

One commissioner noted, “The judge just wants clarification on SITLA voluntarily going through this process and abiding by the ordinances.” This statement underscores the uncertainty surrounding SITLA's commitment to local regulations, which could set a precedent for future land use decisions.

The discussion also touched on the implications of leasing agreements, particularly with companies like Love's. If Love's were to lease land from SITLA and proceed with development, the question arose about whether they would be considered property owners under state law, thus subject to county regulations. The complexity of these legal definitions could significantly impact future developments in the area.

As the meeting concluded, the commission acknowledged the need for clearer guidelines and communication between SITLA and local authorities. The outcome of these discussions could shape the future of land use in San Juan County, emphasizing the delicate balance between state authority and local governance. The commission plans to continue addressing these issues in upcoming meetings, aiming for a resolution that respects both state law and community interests.