Berkeley Council faces backlash over denial of Little Seedlings daycare request

The Berkley City Council convened on March 17, 2025, to address several key issues, with a significant focus on the controversial denial of a special land use request for Little Seedlings daycare. The meeting began with public comments, where residents expressed strong support for the daycare, emphasizing its importance to families in the community.

One resident, who identified herself as a representative of Little Seedlings, voiced her frustration over the council's decision, stating that the city had previously promised her the ability to operate a group home childcare for 12 children before she purchased her home. She argued that the council's reversal on this promise was detrimental not only to her but also to families in the area who rely on quality childcare services. She highlighted the existence of an unlicensed daycare nearby, questioning the council's inconsistency in enforcing regulations.

Chad Linton, another resident, echoed these sentiments, urging the council to reconsider its vote. He raised concerns about a potential conflict of interest involving Mayor Dean and requested that the mayor recuse himself from any future votes on the matter. Linton emphasized the community's support for the daycare and downplayed traffic concerns associated with additional children.

Following public comments, City Clerk Ms. Mitchell reported receiving multiple correspondences from residents requesting the council to rescind its previous vote denying the daycare's special land use request. The council then turned to legal counsel, who addressed the ethics concerns raised during public comments, affirming that there was no conflict of interest regarding the mayor's participation in the vote.

The meeting proceeded with the approval of the consent agenda, which included various administrative items such as the approval of minutes from previous meetings, financial agreements, and updates to city ordinances. Notably, the council approved a budgeted purchase for a new skid steer and an agreement for LED street lighting upgrades.

In conclusion, the March 17 meeting highlighted the community's strong desire for accessible childcare options and raised questions about the council's decision-making process. The council's next steps regarding the daycare's special land use request remain to be seen, as residents continue to advocate for a reconsideration of the vote.