Oregon's House Bill 3819, introduced on April 11, 2025, aims to enhance regulatory oversight and enforcement within the massage therapy industry. The bill seeks to address ongoing concerns regarding unlicensed practice and violations of existing regulations, which have raised public safety and professional integrity issues.
Key provisions of HB 3819 include the empowerment of the State Board of Massage Therapists to issue subpoenas for witness appearances and document production in investigations. This authority mirrors civil case procedures, allowing the board to compel compliance effectively. Additionally, the bill proposes increasing the maximum civil penalty for violations from $1,000 to $5,000, thereby strengthening deterrents against non-compliance. The board will also have the authority to post violation notices on massage facilities, which can incur daily fines if removed.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Debate surrounding the bill has highlighted concerns from some massage therapists about the potential for overreach and the impact of increased penalties on small businesses. Proponents argue that these measures are necessary to protect consumers and uphold the standards of the profession. The bill has garnered support from various advocacy groups emphasizing public safety and professional accountability.
The implications of HB 3819 extend beyond regulatory compliance; it reflects a broader commitment to consumer protection in Oregon. Experts suggest that the bill could lead to improved standards within the industry, potentially enhancing the reputation of licensed massage therapists while discouraging illegal practices.
As the legislative process continues, stakeholders are closely monitoring the bill's progress, anticipating that its passage could significantly reshape the landscape of massage therapy regulation in Oregon. The next steps will involve further discussions and potential amendments as lawmakers weigh the balance between enforcement and the operational realities faced by practitioners in the field.