[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6606886,"mediaKeyId","2957051-6121315fa3d35ac01222a1d597fc1a94","parentId",2957051,"title","Boulder updates council on Core Arterial Network; teams seek SEAP decisions this summer for North 30th and Folsom","audioSeconds",4224,"startMs",5764000,"endMs",9988000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2957051-6121315fa3d35ac01222a1d597fc1a94&start=5764&end=9988","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2957051-6121315fa3d35ac01222a1d597fc1a94/thumbnail_5764000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6606886/Boulder/Boulder-County/Colorado/Boulder-updates-council-on-Core-Arterial-Network-teams-seek-SEAP-decisions-this-summer-for-North-30th-and-Folsom","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6606886-53327011e29e767565e56d027b57e30c/orig.mp4?Expires=1771065821&Signature=NAFo~VGMf7A0vAkPCTG79OPr~JVl0iayU85esZJvUMiAumR~Vc5thnBoiWUxEhHbyhusRlvGp6mdku7EQ3LwRG49hfty4DS3ROwEuNxrhlNxbvxVOJdMtThKKrqe2ExlT1TxdUDdqpVxNb1Hy2kZ3fbvgLSOdQ28Kkj6xthWy7NnDrobYtHaJcq3wYxXU-pLvo2jkucEZwQkDJN99boKSHcciqKSp0lgWKv6CtPygSrJ1uQGuDFmUDylloe5sOB~Oe5tPD76Q648P7gQ1SN25JeZNDp52vVR9zaQCiE~imAhjlJ-PGpNwlxPR29ry7llArAh~6o~nSxcJK7LP79c7A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Boulder City, CO","date","2025-04-11T03:32:38.217Z","article","Boulder transportation officials gave council an update on the Core Arterial Network (CAN), outlining project progress, community outreach plans and near‑term decision points for two priority corridors: North Thirtieth Street and Folsom Street.

Interim Transportation and Mobility Director Valerie Watson and Principal Project Manager Melanie Sloan described a portfolio of 15 active CAN projects in varying stages of planning, design and construction and emphasized safety outcomes tied to the city’s Vision Zero objectives. \"Travel safety for all is at the heart of the project status updates that you will hear tonight,\" Watson said.

What staff presented
- Priority corridors: Baseline Road, Iris Avenue and Folsom Street remain the three CAN priority corridors targeted for community engagement and conceptual design by 2025. Baseline Phase 2 construction is expected to begin later this year with about a 15‑month schedule.
- SEAP process: The community and environmental assessment process (SEAP) is the city’s formal review used to evaluate conceptual alternatives. Staff asked council to prepare for SEAP actions: North Thirtieth SEAP in June and Folsom SEAP in July/August.
- Safety data: Both corridors are on the Vision Zero and Denver Regional Council of Governments high‑injury lists. Staff highlighted that a meaningful share of serious‑injury crashes involves pedestrians, bicyclists and other vulnerable users.
- Funding: The city was awarded $23 million in federal Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) funds in late 2023; about $9 million is allocated to final design and construction on a specified North Thirtieth segment. Staff reported they have not been notified of changes to previously awarded grants and said they will monitor federal funding risks while pursuing additional grants.

Design tradeoffs and community priorities
Project teams described three conceptual alternatives for each corridor that trade off vehicle travel time and transit reliability against space for protected bike lanes, wider sidewalks, protected intersections and urban design. Melanie Sloan said alternatives differ by how and where vehicle lanes would be repurposed to create continuous space for safety and multimodal use.

Council questions and engagement
Council members repeatedly pressed staff on practical concerns including tree canopy, long‑term maintenance, potential effects on emergency response times, and funding tradeoffs if grant support is delayed. Several council members urged staff to prioritize engagement with underrepresented residents and with groups who rely on the corridors for transit and daily travel.

Examples from the discussion
- Maintenance and urban design: Council members asked how life‑cycle maintenance costs and tree survivability would be factored into SEAP scoring and future design choices; staff said they coordinate with landscape architects and parks to select resilient species and take lifecycle cost into account during final design.
- Implementation feasibility: For North Thirtieth the city must balance safety ambition with the terms of an awarded SS4A grant and the grant’s 2029 implementation timeline; staff said alternatives were evaluated for feasibility with grant deliverables in mind.

Next steps
- Staff will finalize draft SEAP evaluations after ongoing public input, return to council for the North Thirtieth SEAP action in June, and to TAB and council on Folsom in July/August.
- Staff will continue pursuing federal, state and regional grants, pair grant funds with internal programs (for example, pavement management) and report funding implications to council as project scopes firm up.

Ending
Council members praised the pace and breadth of engagement while urging careful prioritization in a tighter funding environment. \"We are built for resilience,\" Watson said, describing the department’s long record of pursuing grants and aligning limited local dollars to advance projects. Staff emphasized the SEAP decisions later this summer will reflect tradeoffs among safety, travel time and implementation feasibility.

","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","April 10, 2025 City of Boulder City Council Study Session","oneSentenceSummary","Boulder transportation staff updated the City Council on progress advancing the Core Arterial Network and signaled that community and environmental assessment (SEAP) decisions on North Thirtieth Street and Folsom Street will reach council this summer.","taxTitle","Boulder, Boulder County, Colorado","taxId",3386,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6606889,"Boulder staff present nexus study, propose up-to-$15/sq ft impact fee for large home additions and teardowns",5432,341000,5773000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2957051-6121315fa3d35ac01222a1d597fc1a94&start=341&end=5773","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2957051-6121315fa3d35ac01222a1d597fc1a94/thumbnail_341000.jpg","/articles/6606889/Boulder/Boulder-County/Colorado/Boulder-staff-present-nexus-study-propose-up-to-15sq-ft-impact-fee-for-large-home-additions-and-teardowns","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6606889-3180ca680d4f4957b37139d4e0da766c/orig.mp4?Expires=1771065821&Signature=V7xeQ~fOR7uRXblICkTg0fRov0TDeGTeRPwLGsg5SOf3tmtBxHyVYxNsASqsvLbOfiCjQMY86vjHJhWdo8tlJB0-xHE~1-qc1Rh6gfZHLE4pSlbjvmyfD9QS5WqDmKfQ6SOsgI-SbROF~SJTQbONIGKWbIRmqntzdiKfIyi5sv2CfAMTY7XYA49Qt7B0TdqZtq1ODfTezkVQuRBDrhoECFiZCqS-IC-AWYa8WZNmQDSMDdZRhTWRrLPm5MaEcm~gebJ-3TwTrlrfk4To05JGLw07wHbuHxoG6gAtID79waylwzKp933ZiYUDZIuLvgXTvhGOpHfJttkWr3gayXAk5A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Boulder City Council members on Tuesday reviewed a completed nexus study and staff recommendations for a residential impact fee aimed at offsetting the affordable‑housing impacts of single‑family home teardowns and large additions.

The study, presented by consultant Andrew (Andy) Ratchford of Gruen+Associates and Housing Planner Sloan Wahlberg, estimates that a fee applied to net new above‑ground living area could be justified and recommends a conservative maximum of roughly $15 per added square foot. \"We think the fee probably shouldn't be any more than $15 per square foot of additional living space,\" Ratchford said.

Why it matters: Council directed staff in 2023 to study how demolitions of smaller homes and large additions affect Boulder’s affordable housing supply and needs. Staff say current inclusionary housing rules apply only to new housing, so replacements of existing single‑family homes frequently avoid inclusionary requirements through demolition‑and‑replacement waivers. Kurt Fernhaver, director of Housing and Human Services, said the proposed fee is intended to address that inequity by generating revenue for the city’s Affordable Housing Fund.

Key findings and proposal
- The nexus analysis focused on a demand linkage: higher‑priced replacement homes tend to be occupied by higher‑income households whose local spending creates additional jobs, which in turn increases demand for affordable workforce housing. Ratchford summarized the model as producing about 0.15 to 0.45 additional affordable units of need per project, depending on scenario assumptions.
- The consultant calculated ownership/rental “gap” subsidies needed to house those workers and converted that into a maximum justifiable per‑project fee. Example maximums ranged from about $14,000 to $44,000 per project depending on scenario; staff recommended a uniform per‑square‑foot fee and suggested using the lower end of estimates.
- Staff recommend applying the fee to net new living area added by demolition/replacement or major additions, exempting net increases below 500 square feet (for example, many ADUs under that size would be exempt). Sloan Wahlberg noted the exemption is intended to avoid applying the fee to modest expansions.
- Estimated yield: Based on historic counts (about 23 replacements and 35 additions per year), the recommended $15/sq ft fee would likely generate roughly $1.2 million annually, staff said.

Council questions and concerns
Council members asked about legal limits, distribution of funds, and effects on homeowner choices. Ratchford and staff repeatedly emphasized the analysis is structured to satisfy legal requirements for an impact fee: \"To avoid a takings clause, you have to show that direct linkage between what you're asking ... and the actual impacts on affordable housing,\" Ratchford said.

Several council members urged careful implementation to avoid unintended harm to middle‑income homeowners who simply need additional bedrooms or space. Council Member Tara Weiner and others pressed for exemptions or tiering that would reduce the fee’s burden on modest family expansions; staff said implementation could include waivers or exemptions and that staff will seek feedback during public engagement.

Comparative context and implementation schedule
Ratchford reviewed similar policies in other U.S. cities (Denver, Aspen, Los Angeles, Evanston), noting approaches and rates vary widely. Staff proposed an engagement and code‑change schedule that would pursue public outreach through July, follow racial‑equity assessment guidance, and return with draft code changes in the fall.

Details and clarifications from staff (selected)
- Current single‑family inclusionary cash‑in‑lieu rate cited in materials: $15.34 per square foot (used for comparison), though the proposed new fee is calculated separately and would apply only to net added area, not to full house size.
- Waiver rule: Inclusionary requirements are currently waived if a demolished unit is replaced within three years; that waiver is a root cause of the inequity the proposal seeks to address.
- Activity levels: Staff reported an average of about 23 replacements and 35 substantial additions per year in recent years.

Next steps and scope limitations
This was a study‑session briefing; no ordinance was proposed or adopted at the meeting. Staff asked council for clarifying questions and initial policy guidance ahead of a public engagement period. Staff said the nexus analysis focuses on the demand linkage (jobs/housing need) and does not attempt to quantify any direct loss of units that would have been affordable absent redevelopment, because the market characteristics of affected parcels make such losses hard to substantiate in the legal analysis.

Ending
Council members differed on the appropriate size of any fee, the exemption threshold, and whether ADUs should be exempt. Staff said they will return with additional outreach results and draft code language later in 2025. \"Keeping the revenue broad would probably have the biggest impact,\" Kurt Fernhaver said of the eventual fund use, while also acknowledging implementation choices about targeting funds to middle‑income or lower‑income programs remain policy decisions for council.

","City staff and a consultant presented a nexus study that ties large single‑family home replacements and major additions to increased workforce housing need, and recommended a per‑square‑foot impact fee capped at about $15 on added living area, with a proposed 500‑sq‑ft exemption and annual revenue estimate of roughly $1.2 million.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Boulder updates council on Core Arterial Network; teams seek SEAP decisions this summer for North 30th and Folsom

Boulder staff present nexus study, propose up-to-$15/sq ft impact fee for large home additions and teardowns