[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6606330,"mediaKeyId","2965503-c64c0c89e621b1f2d62d013276b95cde","parentId",2965503,"title","Hundreds of renters and advocates press council to cap rent increases and agendize LARSO changes","audioSeconds",6223,"startMs",4809000,"endMs",11032000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2965503-c64c0c89e621b1f2d62d013276b95cde&start=4809&end=11032","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2965503-c64c0c89e621b1f2d62d013276b95cde/thumbnail_4809000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6606330/Los-Angeles-City/Los-Angeles-County/California/Hundreds-of-renters-and-advocates-press-council-to-cap-rent-increases-and-agendize-LARSO-changes","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6606330-7234f5382351adfe58f4b210ee651f9d/orig.mp4?Expires=1775786745&Signature=GzzILlqVjjm0Oi1RtXdeL0WWaCqRheMzBaludxGzbANanvnwyYzJWR6nMpRA~2hbMnV5Uq59EZlryKn34FARzbbee44HPyuadQBkdTGTOJUikjGczz0HLs8v67KynTe7JZAVnhvplfHME7b49LasDh3Yd3VUA05g0eHVmX3w4eqvfwaCPPSC5~Oi--JK-dlGtB2osASBE9XWZVHzhbzIJYgjc9rXYbTHXGkM0HpWZ9fg6FkEcuAnjU1ADl3Byd9IaKtZA7t7ZKYj4Z8OKYkRBNCdQW9WUTXORZwpxt~YyRXCWmfVYTM5yMVWQDOQlTbk5JQK8mwu793LaopBio~7yA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Los Angeles City","date","2025-04-11T19:53:41.517Z","article","Dozens of tenants, tenant advocates and community organizers used the public‑comment period at the April 11 Los Angeles City Council meeting to urge the council to cap rent increases and to agendize a change to the Los Angeles Rent Stabilization Ordinance (LARSO).

Speakers representing Keep LA Housed, ACE and neighborhood councils made personal appeals and described financial hardship and housing instability if rent increases continue at recent rates. Wendy Lopez, a District 9 resident, said the prospect of large rent increases forces untenable choices: “Should I buy food for my kids, or should I pay rent?” she told the council.

Advocates asked the council to adopt a formula that would cap annual rent increases between 0% and 3%, a change supporters said would reduce evictions and homelessness. Tommy, a community board representative from CB‑14 speaking on behalf of LA CAN, cited data in testimony: “A $100 increase in rent leads to a 9% rise in homelessness,” he said, arguing a cap would prevent further displacement.

Keep LA Housed and ACE speakers described widespread concern among street vendors, low‑wage workers, seniors and single‑parent households, sharing examples of residents who said they cannot absorb large rent hikes. Multiple callers urged councilmembers to hold town halls in their districts with tenant groups and to place the LARSO amendments on a council or committee agenda so the matter can be debated formally.

Council response: Several councilmembers acknowledged the urgency raised by speakers and said they would work with tenants and tenant groups, but the council took no formal action to change LARSO at the meeting. Councilmember Adrien Nazarian was singled out by speakers for previously agreeing to cap increases at recent town halls; advocates urged other members to follow suit and agendize the proposal.

Context: Rent‑stabilization rules and allowable annual increases are governed by local ordinance and state law; changes to local ordinance typically require committee hearings and council votes. Speakers said the current formula produces increases that push many low‑income and working families close to eviction.

Next steps: Advocates left the meeting urging councilmembers to schedule hearings and to adopt an immediate cap, while council offices said they would coordinate outreach and consider town halls. Because the requests came during public comment, further action will require committee or council agenda items and formal committee review.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Regular City Council - 4/11/25","oneSentenceSummary","During public comment, dozens of tenants and tenant‑advocacy groups urged the City Council to adopt a 0–3% rent‑increase cap and to add changes to the Los Angeles Rent Stabilization Ordinance (LARSO) to the agenda; council did not take action on LARSO at the meeting.","taxTitle","Los Angeles City, Los Angeles County, California","taxId",4025,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6606335,"Council rejects multi‑year hazardous‑waste contract; orders review after vendor worked 10 months without formal agreement",1,10440000,10441000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2965503-c64c0c89e621b1f2d62d013276b95cde&start=10440&end=10441","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2965503-c64c0c89e621b1f2d62d013276b95cde/thumbnail_10440000.jpg","/articles/6606335/Los-Angeles-City/Los-Angeles-County/California/Council-rejects-multiyear-hazardouswaste-contract-orders-review-after-vendor-worked-10-months-without-formal-agreement","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6606335-f40e02029902f792d255eba2eda6bfeb/orig.mp4?Expires=1775786745&Signature=hueDW98VyFMkEDjNDLYMo83Zugj~aPs67jGwSZi5-B0cFbSMQNbec7njXfXxcXc~IeloXzzQYrBbhkxfjbHYmnRKebrfAJgYkVYZpjqTMAE9Lluol-~lgf5CnQoB83lqLtxBcpHHZbkRgKuottS3AmZk5vHsuUMnTLeTiK3uz6zpJjLPNDrGC9ui87sGhkzkhZXvLyL3E8NXI5CKZGzobocodf~vJioaD1vQRtHDhRPcb6sddXa94MOffB4wc16nZVfiW34WW-2Arkd~7F~XdwNWFYIfvmDlrDRNmaPxrf0FXGikxCqiO2PrvGMSRcVbL3OQgrXgS-dE2hsFMJx~rw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Los Angeles City Council on April 11 adopted the public safety committee recommendation to disapprove a proposed three‑year contract with Clean Harbors for routine and emergency hazardous‑waste management at fire facilities, instructing the Los Angeles Fire Department and the City Administrative Officer to return with additional vendor information.

Background and vote: The vote followed a committee debate and floor discussion about vendor selection and the mechanics of an expired contract. The Clerk recorded the council’s action as adopting the public safety committee report (11 ayes), which effectively rejected the proposed agreement as presented and directed a report back with detailed information.

Fire Department officials told the council that Clean Harbors had continued providing collection services for roughly 10 months after the prior contract expired and that the city owed the contractor about $260,000 for services rendered during the lapse. “They are currently 10 months out of contract and we do owe them about 260,000 at this point,” said Captain Ryan Jones, who described services including pickup of waste motor oil, cooking oil and medical biohazards from about 120 fire‑department sites.

Committee concerns and council action: Councilmembers raised questions in committee about where the vendor’s workforce is based, whether subcontractors are local, whether subcontractors pay prevailing wages, and whether there had been any recent safety or workplace incidents tied to the vendor. Those questions were not fully answered on the committee record, prompting the committee report to recommend disapproval and a deeper city review. The council then approved the committee recommendation to disapprove the contract and tasked the city attorney, CAO and Fire Department to return with answers on safety records, subcontracting practices and prevailing‑wage compliance.

Operational risk: Fire officials warned that if the contract were disapproved without a transition plan, services for picking up these hazardous materials could be interrupted. Staff described a possible administrative mechanism to make a one‑time payment for services rendered to date but said continuing services without a contract would be contingent on the vendor’s willingness.

Next steps: The council’s action returns the matter to the Fire Department with explicit instructions to report back on vendor safety history, worker pay and subcontracting, and to pursue a request for proposals if appropriate. McCosker and other members said they would press for an expedited new procurement that includes labor, local‑hire and subcontracting standards the committee asked for.

The public safety committee’s motion and the council’s action clarify that the city will not approve the proposed multi‑year contract as drafted and will seek more complete information before moving forward.","The council adopted a public safety committee report to disapprove a proposed multi‑year Clean Harbors contract for hazardous‑waste removal and directed LAFD and the CAO to report back on vendor safety history, subcontracting and prevailing‑wage compliance.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6606340,"City Council confirms personnel department general manager amid hiring and budget concerns",903,3252000,4155000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2965503-c64c0c89e621b1f2d62d013276b95cde&start=3252&end=4155","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2965503-c64c0c89e621b1f2d62d013276b95cde/thumbnail_3252000.jpg","/articles/6606340/Los-Angeles-City/Los-Angeles-County/California/City-Council-confirms-personnel-department-general-manager-amid-hiring-and-budget-concerns","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6606340-8b040daed9f4d1b1fc66d38c5f7969e7/orig.mp4?Expires=1775786745&Signature=XfMYK5OaRNw-uTKEOuWe03vW3Wk3XkDPuOqJKCE9DjVJkVkz~pqSPyiIOgY0pLnas8Pjlt5GEBsQyGQfOh5oE11ulwKjsf0-wmKKp78IwKhJaVwqL2dQY1D9ezS116Bsjq9dVmyzXAkO0QzjhhJyECW3e1bhGsWiTUJ67X4Wk5Ntc-3JEK10uQU0czN3fzamCbp70fvVeQEmADUyjy-TLRcxbFC3vJtA7TXbOgzUpaJ4uMJ--KeGq3rc5~Ye3mjc23KU3hL5o~BYyNHUiM1SG9LblQGO7ZAvnf8aay7VbB5vTjScvKeqEOFCrfo4XZ-UJjBkMmypoCDRso1E1Mmlsg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Los Angeles City Council confirmed the mayor’s nominee for general manager of the Personnel Department by an 11–0 vote on April 11, a unanimous endorsement after the nominee outlined plans to streamline hiring processes and build a citywide workforce culture.

The nominee, identified in the hearing as the assistant chief administrative officer and asked to join the dais, described a people‑centered approach that blends legal and administrative experience with an emphasis on transparency, fairness and collaboration. “I am ready to lead. I am ready to work shoulder to shoulder with all of you to build a city workforce as vibrant, resilient, and extraordinary as the people we serve,” the nominee said during remarks to council members.

Why it matters: The Personnel Department leads citywide hiring, labor relations and workforce strategy. Councilmembers stressed that the department will play a central role in any staffing decisions that may follow from the city’s stated fiscal challenges, and the new general manager is expected to work with LAPD and other departments to improve hiring timetables and onboarding.

Committee chair Bob Blumenfield and committee members praised the nominee’s record. At the Personnel and Hiring Committee, members said the nominee had presented a clear vision for prioritizing fairness and empathy in a department that has recently faced operational strain. Councilmembers who addressed the nominee on the floor noted her work on the unarmed crisis response pilot and previous experience in litigation and city legal work.

In her presentation, the nominee said she intends to examine the civil‑service system and recommend collaborative, evidence‑based adjustments without any predetermined ideological outcome. She emphasized public‑safety hiring as urgent, saying the department must remove unnecessary barriers that delay the hiring of police candidates while preserving standards: “We will work directly with LAPD … to prioritize hiring processes and strong onboarding, training, and systems,” she said.

Councilmembers from across the chamber welcomed the confirmation. Several members highlighted the nominee’s experience building programs from the ground up, documenting outcomes and evaluating results — qualities they said would serve the Personnel Department as it faces potential staffing decisions and possible budget constraints.

The council’s roll call recorded 11 ayes. The personnel and hiring committee report had been circulated in advance of the vote and committee members described their unanimous recommendation prior to floor action.

With confirmation complete, councilmembers asked for continued close collaboration between the Personnel Department, the City Administrative Office and department HR teams to manage any transition periods and to keep employees informed in the event of fiscal measures that affect staffing.","The City Council unanimously confirmed the mayor’s nominee to lead the Personnel Department, who told members she will focus on civil‑service reforms, hiring processes for public safety and workforce culture as the city faces fiscal constraints.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6606345,"City Council approves new solid‑waste fee to cover organics mandate, expands low‑income relief",2014,7958000,9972000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2965503-c64c0c89e621b1f2d62d013276b95cde&start=7958&end=9972","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2965503-c64c0c89e621b1f2d62d013276b95cde/thumbnail_7958000.jpg","/articles/6606345/Los-Angeles-City/Los-Angeles-County/California/City-Council-approves-new-solidwaste-fee-to-cover-organics-mandate-expands-lowincome-relief","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6606345-5cf51be4c6857fab3f72325c04fdd2d0/orig.mp4?Expires=1775786745&Signature=E0Rs5jV~fQDNgUSgSYlqMRhElTBVURacMfQRDPqrvNGydViGoLcpM28GiWx~QUab7EBl8TVNffbsfkQ7BFSqIBPMiV88s3FjPo7ZZoXodksBGnt4Ke1jpsQ42bcOAQs39TMld~L1KeBHkWxpROalEXObGgVIPVRwEWah5HDSL1oPPls96nzSn6cXDBAPBI24g-d~q6cNjJObdAPiox0MeK6Pc2OUuOfLRhG-M4Wb0fXeq6S7EXs8Ya2b-FxVt1PzD3nYAi99UoHGTnvxRE6fvqeTrrjr~7jqPO7O2FdRgunOWebBtLNtIVn5JXPHxUd8q2ZFLLeFX-0kX7vx9C8KFg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Los Angeles City Council voted 10–1 on April 11 to approve a multi‑year increase to the city’s solid resources fee, a change Sanitation leaders say is necessary to cover the cost of new state organic‑waste rules, rising equipment and labor costs and programs such as unlimited bulky‑item pickup.

The vote sends the proposal forward with an implementation date the department has modeled for Jan. 1, 2026, with subsequent adjustments effective each July 1 for the following four years. Department officials said the fee package is projected to generate about $184 million for the solid resources program and roughly $8.5 million for a multifamily bulky‑item program over the plan period and would sharply reduce a growing general‑fund subsidy.

Why it matters: Los Angeles has relied on the general fund to cover an increasing share of sanitation costs. That subsidy, Sanitation officials said, reached roughly $217 million within five years — nearly 40% of program costs — and will continue to grow unless fees are adjusted.

“The $217,000,000 in general fund subsidy amounts to nearly 40% of those costs, and that percentage will continue to increase if we do not have a rate adjustment,” said Barbara Romero, director and general manager of LA Sanitation and Environment, during the council presentation.

Council members and staff said the price drivers include state law and program changes, such as Assembly Bill/Senate Bill 1383, which requires source‑separated organic collection and more costly composting or anaerobic digestion processing, a collapse in recycling commodity revenue, higher truck costs and higher labor and fuel prices. Sanitation officials said the per‑truck cost has roughly doubled since 2008; new LNG trucks and electrification planning were included in the department’s cost modeling.

The adopted proposal would standardize a three‑container service (black for refuse, blue for recycling and green for organics, as required under SB 1383) for single‑family and small multifamily customers, set capacity‑based charges for additional containers and continue citywide services such as unlimited bulky‑item pickup, Christmas tree recycling and hazardous‑materials drop‑offs.

Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez, chair of the Public Works and Energy & Environment Committee, framed the vote as a necessary but difficult step. “This is not sustainable, and it’s not equitable,” Hernandez said, noting that the general fund had subsidized service that primarily benefits a subset of residents and that delaying increases simply shifts the burden to other city services.

Sanitation staff said the department conducted a Prop 218–style cost‑of‑service study and would begin the formal notice and protest process required for property‑related user fees if the council authorized the change. Nicole Bernsen, assistant director, outlined the outreach plan: mailed notices, translated materials, webinars, community events and a rate calculator online. She said mailings would start immediately if council approved and a public hearing would follow no sooner than 45 days after the last mailing, as required by law.

The proposal also expands low‑income assistance. Under the plan the department would remove a previous dual‑eligibility requirement (low income plus senior or disability) and instead make the lifeline discount available to all qualified low‑income customers, which the department estimates could reduce bills by up to 30% for eligible households. Sanitation staff estimated that expanding eligibility and removing the existing cap would increase the program’s general‑fund cost by about $10 million annually if the council adopts the expanded assistance option.

Councilmember Tim McOsker and other members urged aggressive outreach to ensure eligible residents apply for assistance, and several members pressed staff for district‑specific community education about the change. Councilmember Gil Cedillo (not on the dais but on record during committee) and others stressed the need for ongoing rate reviews; Councilmember Nazarian registered the lone NO vote saying he objected to the methodology and wanted more data and a phased review schedule.

The council approved the fee package 10–1. Sanitation staff and outside consultants said they will proceed with Prop 218 notice mailings and district outreach; if returned protests do not exceed a majority of affected properties the fee will move forward to implementation per the scheduled timeline.

Community reaction during public comment was mixed: union representatives and Sanitation employees urged the council to approve the increase to maintain service levels and modernize equipment; community advocates pressed for rapid, proactive outreach and additional affordability protections. Environmental and composting advocates told the council expanded organics collection is critical to meeting the state’s climate goals and to building local compost processing capacity.

The council’s action is intended to reduce the city’s reliance on general‑fund subsidies for sanitation services and to bring the fee structure into alignment with state mandates and current operating costs. If fully implemented Jan. 1, 2026, Sanitation estimated the action will reduce general‑fund pressure and support a multi‑year plan for fleet modernization and yard upgrades.","The Los Angeles City Council voted 10–1 to adopt a revised solid resources fee intended to reduce a growing general‑fund subsidy, pay for SB 1383 organics processing requirements and fund fleet and yard upgrades, while expanding low‑income assistance.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Hundreds of renters and advocates press council to cap rent increases and agendize LARSO changes

Council rejects multi‑year hazardous‑waste contract; orders review after vendor worked 10 months without formal agreement

City Council confirms personnel department general manager amid hiring and budget concerns

City Council approves new solid‑waste fee to cover organics mandate, expands low‑income relief