Union member criticizes Humboldt County board for limiting public comments on negotiations

During the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors meeting on March 11, 2025, significant concerns were raised regarding public participation and transparency in labor negotiations. A county employee, speaking on behalf of fellow union members, criticized the board for limiting public comments related to labor issues. The speaker highlighted that recent directives from Supervisor Bushnell have discouraged employees from voicing their opinions during public comment periods, particularly when discussions may touch on sensitive topics like budget priorities and management practices.

The employee emphasized that many county workers face time constraints, often needing to use unpaid breaks or vacation time to attend meetings. This restriction effectively silences their voices on critical issues, as labor negotiations are typically scheduled at the end of lengthy meetings. The speaker argued that this practice not only undermines public discourse but also raises legal and ethical concerns regarding the board's adherence to the Begley Keane Open Meetings Act.

In response to these concerns, another attendee, Jamie Bolton, sought clarification on when they could return to discuss financial negotiations, indicating a willingness to engage but feeling constrained by the meeting's structure. The board acknowledged the issue, with the Chief Administrative Officer suggesting that Bolton could leave contact information to be notified when the closed session would occur.

Additionally, a plea was made regarding Measure S, with a community member requesting an extension on repayment timelines due to economic challenges in the cannabis market. This request underscored the ongoing financial difficulties faced by residents and the need for the board to consider flexible solutions.

As the meeting progressed, the board reiterated its commitment to transparency and public engagement, although the effectiveness of these assurances remains to be seen. The discussions highlighted a critical need for the board to reassess its approach to public comments, ensuring that all voices, especially those of county employees, are heard and valued in the decision-making process.