Whitefish residents challenge airport zoning interpretation and call for code amendment

Concerns over airport safety and zoning regulations took center stage at the Whitefish Community Development Board meeting on January 16, 2025. Residents voiced strong objections regarding the interpretation of a 300-foot setback requirement for a proposed hangar at the local airport, arguing that the current zoning code lacks clarity and could jeopardize public health and safety.

Bob, a local resident, initiated the discussion by highlighting the absence of clear language in the 2014 zoning code, which he claimed failed to specify that the setback only applied to the runway. He urged the board to consider a code amendment as the logical next step to address these ambiguities.

Kate McMahon, a seasoned urban planner and resident of Whitefish, followed up with a detailed analysis of the situation. She emphasized that the conditional use permit (CUP) for the hangar could not comply with the setback requirement, as it does not meet the necessary safety standards. McMahon pointed out that the lack of transparency during the public hearing process raised significant concerns, particularly since questions about the setback had been repeatedly ignored.

The appeal, supported by a petition with 52 signatures, argued that the board must carefully consider the implications of their decisions on future airport developments. McMahon stressed that the interpretation of the zoning code should encompass all airport operations, not just the runway, to ensure adequate safety measures are in place.

The board's decision on this matter could set a crucial precedent for how future conditional use permits are handled, with implications for both local residents and airport operations. As discussions continue, the community remains watchful, advocating for a thorough review of the zoning regulations to safeguard public health and safety.